Hi, Markus
On 04/24, Markus Theil wrote:
>Hi Xiaolong,
>
>I also tested with i40e devices, with the same result.
>
>./dpdk-testpmd -n 4 --log-level=pmd.net.af_xdp:debug --no-pci --vdev
>net_af_xdp0,iface=enp36s0f0 --vdev net_af_xdp1,iface=enp36s0f1
>EAL: Detected 16 lcore(s)
>EAL: Detected 1 NUMA
Hi Xiaolong,
with only one vdev everything works. It stops working if I use two
vdevs. Both interfaces were brought up before testing.
Best regards,
Markus
On 24.04.19 16:47, Ye Xiaolong wrote:
> Hi, Markus
>
> On 04/24, Markus Theil wrote:
>> Hi Xiaolong,
>>
>> I also tested with i40e devices,
Hi, Markus
On 04/24, Markus Theil wrote:
>Hi Xiaolong,
>
>I also tested with i40e devices, with the same result.
>
>./dpdk-testpmd -n 4 --log-level=pmd.net.af_xdp:debug --no-pci --vdev
>net_af_xdp0,iface=enp36s0f0 --vdev net_af_xdp1,iface=enp36s0f1
>EAL: Detected 16 lcore(s)
>EAL: Detected 1 NUMA
Hi Xiaolong,
I also tested with i40e devices, with the same result.
./dpdk-testpmd -n 4 --log-level=pmd.net.af_xdp:debug --no-pci --vdev
net_af_xdp0,iface=enp36s0f0 --vdev net_af_xdp1,iface=enp36s0f1
EAL: Detected 16 lcore(s)
EAL: Detected 1 NUMA nodes
EAL: Multi-process socket /var/run/dpdk/rte/
Hi, Markus
On 04/23, Markus Theil wrote:
>Hi Xiaolong,
>
>I tested your commit "net/af_xdp: fix creating multiple instance" on the
>current master branch. It does not work for me in the following minimal
>test setting:
>
>1) allocate 2x 1GB huge pages for DPDK
>
>2) ip link add p1 type veth peer n
Hi Xiaolong,
I tested your commit "net/af_xdp: fix creating multiple instance" on the
current master branch. It does not work for me in the following minimal
test setting:
1) allocate 2x 1GB huge pages for DPDK
2) ip link add p1 type veth peer name p2
3) ./dpdk-testpmd --vdev=net_af_xdp0,iface=
Hi, Markus
On 04/17, Markus Theil wrote:
>I tested the new af_xdp based device on the current master branch and
>noticed, that the usage of static mempool names allows only for the
>creation of a single af_xdp vdev. If a second vdev of the same type gets
>created, the mempool allocation fails.
Th
I tested the new af_xdp based device on the current master branch and
noticed, that the usage of static mempool names allows only for the
creation of a single af_xdp vdev. If a second vdev of the same type gets
created, the mempool allocation fails.
Best regards,
Markus Theil
8 matches
Mail list logo