Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] rework EAL argument parsing in DPDK

2025-07-17 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 12:41:46PM +0200, David Marchand wrote: > On Tue, Jul 8, 2025 at 7:21 PM Bruce Richardson > wrote: > > > > This RFC is a second, more complete, prototype of one approach we may > > want to take to help improve management of EAL cmdline arguments. > > > > BACKGROUND: > > - T

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] rework EAL argument parsing in DPDK

2025-07-17 Thread David Marchand
On Tue, Jul 8, 2025 at 7:21 PM Bruce Richardson wrote: > > This RFC is a second, more complete, prototype of one approach we may > want to take to help improve management of EAL cmdline arguments. > > BACKGROUND: > - The first problem that led to this work was that of providing a > way for users

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] rework EAL argument parsing in DPDK

2025-07-09 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 02:30:42PM +0200, David Marchand wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > On Tue, Jul 8, 2025 at 7:21 PM Bruce Richardson > wrote: > > > > This RFC is a second, more complete, prototype of one approach we may > > want to take to help improve management of EAL cmdline arguments. > > > > BACK

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] rework EAL argument parsing in DPDK

2025-07-09 Thread David Marchand
Hi Bruce, On Tue, Jul 8, 2025 at 7:21 PM Bruce Richardson wrote: > > This RFC is a second, more complete, prototype of one approach we may > want to take to help improve management of EAL cmdline arguments. > > BACKGROUND: > - The first problem that led to this work was that of providing a > wa

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] rework EAL argument parsing in DPDK

2025-07-09 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 11:41:01AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jul 2025 17:20:34 + > Bruce Richardson wrote: > > > This RFC is a second, more complete, prototype of one approach we may > > want to take to help improve management of EAL cmdline arguments. > > > > BACKGROUND:

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] rework EAL argument parsing in DPDK

2025-07-08 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Tue, 8 Jul 2025 17:20:34 + Bruce Richardson wrote: > This RFC is a second, more complete, prototype of one approach we may > want to take to help improve management of EAL cmdline arguments. > > BACKGROUND: > - The first problem that led to this work was that of providing a > way for u

[RFC PATCH v2 0/5] rework EAL argument parsing in DPDK

2025-07-08 Thread Bruce Richardson
This RFC is a second, more complete, prototype of one approach we may want to take to help improve management of EAL cmdline arguments. BACKGROUND: - The first problem that led to this work was that of providing a way for users to easily provide a set of CPU cores to DPDK where the CPU ids are