RE: [RFC 00/13] Packet capture using port mirroring

2025-04-13 Thread Morten Brørup
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org] > Sent: Saturday, 12 April 2025 19.05 > > On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 13:06:55 +0200 > Morten Brørup wrote: > > > > From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org] > > > Sent: Saturday, 12 April 2025 01.45 > > > > > > This is a re

Re: [RFC 00/13] Packet capture using port mirroring

2025-04-12 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 13:06:55 +0200 Morten Brørup wrote: > > From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org] > > Sent: Saturday, 12 April 2025 01.45 > > > > This is a rework of how packet capture is done in DPDK. > > The existing mechanism using callbacks has a number of problems; > >

RE: [RFC 00/13] Packet capture using port mirroring

2025-04-12 Thread Morten Brørup
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org] > Sent: Saturday, 12 April 2025 01.45 > > This is a rework of how packet capture is done in DPDK. > The existing mechanism using callbacks has a number of problems; > the main one is that any packets sent/received in a secondary process

[RFC 00/13] Packet capture using port mirroring

2025-04-11 Thread Stephen Hemminger
This is a rework of how packet capture is done in DPDK. The existing mechanism using callbacks has a number of problems; the main one is that any packets sent/received in a secondary process are not visible. The root cause is that callbacks can not function across process boundaries, they are speci