On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 22:51:31 +0100
Morten Brørup wrote:
> > From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roret...@linux.microsoft.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, 17 February 2022 08.42
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 10:10:01AM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 11:05:09AM +0100, Morten Brø
> From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roret...@linux.microsoft.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 17 February 2022 08.42
>
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 10:10:01AM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 11:05:09AM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > > > From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@int
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 11:39:30AM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> My answer is at the end.Sent from a smartphone. Please pardon brevity and
> spelling.
> I am therefore wondering if we needto have our public headers
> C90-compliant?/BruceWe are publicly using C11 for atomics [1]. I'm not sure
>
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 03:00:56PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Yet another case of applying Linux kernel best practices
> to DPDK. Flexible arrays are supported by Clang, GCC and
> Microsoft compilers (part of C99).
Series-Acked-by: Tyler Retzlaff
subject to the outcome of documenting C99
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 10:10:01AM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 11:05:09AM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > > From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, 16 February 2022 10.33
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 03:00:56PM -0800, St
On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 09:33:02 +
Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 03:00:56PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > Yet another case of applying Linux kernel best practices
> > to DPDK. Flexible arrays are supported by Clang, GCC and
> > Microsoft compilers (part of C99).
> >
>
My answer is at the end.Sent from a smartphone. Please pardon brevity and
spelling.
Oprindelig besked Fra: Bruce Richardson
Dato: 16/02/2022 11.15 (GMT+01:00) Til: Morten
Brørup Cc: Stephen Hemminger
, dev@dpdk.org Emne: Re: [RFC 0/2] Eliminate zero
length arrays in DPDK
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 11:05:09AM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, 16 February 2022 10.33
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 03:00:56PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > Yet another case of applying Linux kernel best
> From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 16 February 2022 10.33
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 03:00:56PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > Yet another case of applying Linux kernel best practices
> > to DPDK. Flexible arrays are supported by Clang, GCC and
>
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 03:00:56PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Yet another case of applying Linux kernel best practices
> to DPDK. Flexible arrays are supported by Clang, GCC and
> Microsoft compilers (part of C99).
>
Do we need to start explicitly stating that DPDK uses C99 features, and
add
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, 16 February 2022 00.01
>
> Yet another case of applying Linux kernel best practices
> to DPDK. Flexible arrays are supported by Clang, GCC and
> Microsoft compilers (part of C99).
>
> Stephen Hemminger (2):
> devto
Yet another case of applying Linux kernel best practices
to DPDK. Flexible arrays are supported by Clang, GCC and
Microsoft compilers (part of C99).
Stephen Hemminger (2):
devtools: add script to check for zero length array
treewide: replace zero-length array with flex array
app/test/test_ta
12 matches
Mail list logo
