On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 2:57 PM Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>
> On 3/24/2022 5:46 PM, lon...@linuxonhyperv.com wrote:
> > From: Long Li
> >
> > The netvsc should use RTE_MBUF_F_TX_L4_MASK and check the masked value to
> > decide the correct way to calculate checksums.
> >
> > Not checking for RTE_MBUF_F_
On 3/24/2022 5:46 PM, lon...@linuxonhyperv.com wrote:
From: Long Li
The netvsc should use RTE_MBUF_F_TX_L4_MASK and check the masked value to
decide the correct way to calculate checksums.
Not checking for RTE_MBUF_F_TX_L4_MASK results in incorrect RNDIS packets
sent to VSP and incorrect check
On 3/24/2022 5:46 PM, lon...@linuxonhyperv.com wrote:
From: Long Li
The netvsc should use RTE_MBUF_F_TX_L4_MASK and check the masked value to
decide the correct way to calculate checksums.
Not checking for RTE_MBUF_F_TX_L4_MASK results in incorrect RNDIS packets
sent to VSP and incorrect check
From: Long Li
The netvsc should use RTE_MBUF_F_TX_L4_MASK and check the masked value to
decide the correct way to calculate checksums.
Not checking for RTE_MBUF_F_TX_L4_MASK results in incorrect RNDIS packets
sent to VSP and incorrect checksums calculated by the VSP.
Fixes: 4e9c73e96e ("net/net
4 matches
Mail list logo