Hi Mattias,
On 2022/10/12 4:26, Mattias Rönnblom wrote:
> On 2022-10-11 17:58, Dmitry Kozlyuk wrote:
>> 2022-10-11 12:17 (UTC+), Chengwen Feng:
>>> This patch adds a memarea backup mechanism, where an allocation request
>>> which cannot be met by the current memarea is deferred to its backup
>
Hi Dmitry,
On 2022/10/11 23:58, Dmitry Kozlyuk wrote:
> 2022-10-11 12:17 (UTC+), Chengwen Feng:
>> This patch adds a memarea backup mechanism, where an allocation request
>> which cannot be met by the current memarea is deferred to its backup
>> memarea.
>
> This is a controversial feature.
>
On 2022-10-11 17:58, Dmitry Kozlyuk wrote:
2022-10-11 12:17 (UTC+), Chengwen Feng:
This patch adds a memarea backup mechanism, where an allocation request
which cannot be met by the current memarea is deferred to its backup
memarea.
This is a controversial feature.
1. It violates memarea
2022-10-11 12:17 (UTC+), Chengwen Feng:
> This patch adds a memarea backup mechanism, where an allocation request
> which cannot be met by the current memarea is deferred to its backup
> memarea.
This is a controversial feature.
1. It violates memarea property of freeing all allocated objects
This patch adds a memarea backup mechanism, where an allocation request
which cannot be met by the current memarea is deferred to its backup
memarea.
Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng
---
doc/guides/prog_guide/memarea_lib.rst | 4 ++
lib/memarea/memarea_private.h | 3 ++
lib/memarea/rte_mem
5 matches
Mail list logo