Re: [PATCH v5] build: prevent accidentally building without NUMA support

2023-07-03 Thread Thomas Monjalon
28/06/2023 05:03, Tu, Lijuan: > From: Thomas Monjalon > > 15/06/2023 16:38, Bruce Richardson: > > Is the test ci/Intel-compilation fixed? > > Could you send a new version for testing the CI? > > > > Sorry, this is caused by intel testbeds lack of dep libnuma, Installed it and > re-run the CI, r

RE: [PATCH v5] build: prevent accidentally building without NUMA support

2023-06-27 Thread Tu, Lijuan
> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Monjalon > Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 9:27 PM > To: Richardson, Bruce > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; David Marchand > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] build: prevent accidentally building without NUMA > support > > 15/06/2023 16:38,

Re: [PATCH v5] build: prevent accidentally building without NUMA support

2023-06-27 Thread Thomas Monjalon
15/06/2023 16:38, Bruce Richardson: > When libnuma development package is missing on a system, DPDK can still > be built but will be missing much-needed support for NUMA memory > management. This may later cause issues at runtime if the resulting > binary is run on a NUMA system. > > We can reduce

[PATCH v5] build: prevent accidentally building without NUMA support

2023-06-15 Thread Bruce Richardson
When libnuma development package is missing on a system, DPDK can still be built but will be missing much-needed support for NUMA memory management. This may later cause issues at runtime if the resulting binary is run on a NUMA system. We can reduce the incidence of such runtime errors by ensurin