Re: [PATCH v4 22/25] net/ixgbe: use common Rx rearm code

2025-06-05 Thread Burakov, Anatoly
On 6/4/2025 11:40 AM, Bruce Richardson wrote: On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 02:57:18PM +0100, Anatoly Burakov wrote: The ixgbe driver has implementations of vectorized mbuf rearm code that is identical to the ones in the common code, so just use those. Since ixgbe Rx descriptors are always 16-byte wi

Re: [PATCH v4 22/25] net/ixgbe: use common Rx rearm code

2025-06-04 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 02:57:18PM +0100, Anatoly Burakov wrote: > The ixgbe driver has implementations of vectorized mbuf rearm code that > is identical to the ones in the common code, so just use those. > > Since ixgbe Rx descriptors are always 16-byte wide, force using 16-byte > definitions in

[PATCH v4 22/25] net/ixgbe: use common Rx rearm code

2025-05-30 Thread Anatoly Burakov
The ixgbe driver has implementations of vectorized mbuf rearm code that is identical to the ones in the common code, so just use those. Since ixgbe Rx descriptors are always 16-byte wide, force using 16-byte definitions in the common headers with a define flag. While we're at it, also make sure t