Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] config/arm: use common cpu arch for cross files

2024-03-06 Thread Thomas Monjalon
06/03/2024 16:04, Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage: > > > > > > OK > > > What will become this second patch? > > > > > I will suppress patch 2/2. > > Thanks. > I'm not allowed to suppress it, perhaps someone with admin privileges could > do it. We don't suppress anything :) I can change the status to

RE: [PATCH v4 2/2] config/arm: use common cpu arch for cross files

2024-03-06 Thread Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
> > > > OK > > What will become this second patch? > > > I will suppress patch 2/2. > Thanks. I'm not allowed to suppress it, perhaps someone with admin privileges could do it.

RE: [PATCH v4 2/2] config/arm: use common cpu arch for cross files

2024-03-06 Thread Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
> > Joyce is no longer with Arm, and we have not been able to figure out > > this patch. I think the first patch of this series makes sense. > > This second patch to us looks like a nice to have, rather than > > something that fixes an issue. Therefore, we would like to pull this > > patch out of t

Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] config/arm: use common cpu arch for cross files

2024-03-06 Thread Thomas Monjalon
22/02/2024 22:38, Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage: > Hi Thomas, > > > > [host_machine] > > > system = 'linux' > > > cpu_family = 'aarch64' > > > -cpu = 'armv8-a' > > > +cpu = 'aarch64' > > > > Why aarch64 here and below? > > Joyce is no longer with Arm, and we have not been able to figure out >

RE: [PATCH v4 2/2] config/arm: use common cpu arch for cross files

2024-02-22 Thread Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
Hi Thomas, > > [host_machine] > > system = 'linux' > > cpu_family = 'aarch64' > > -cpu = 'armv8-a' > > +cpu = 'aarch64' > > Why aarch64 here and below? Joyce is no longer with Arm, and we have not been able to figure out this patch. I think the first patch of this series makes sense. This sec

Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] config/arm: use common cpu arch for cross files

2024-02-18 Thread Thomas Monjalon
05/12/2023 04:52, Joyce Kong: > The cpu info in some cross files is inconsistent with > that in SoC flags. The mismatch doesn't cause any issue > because the cpu field in the cross file takes no effect > and machine_args in config/arm/meson.build actually works. > Use a common one in cross files to

RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] config/arm: use common cpu arch for cross files

2024-01-19 Thread Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
PATCH v4 2/2] config/arm: use common cpu arch for cross > files > > External Email > > -- > On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 03:52:59 + > Joyce Kong wrote: > > > The cpu info in some cross files is inconsi

Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] config/arm: use common cpu arch for cross files

2023-12-07 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 03:52:59 + Joyce Kong wrote: > The cpu info in some cross files is inconsistent with > that in SoC flags. The mismatch doesn't cause any issue > because the cpu field in the cross file takes no effect > and machine_args in config/arm/meson.build actually works. > Use a com

[PATCH v4 2/2] config/arm: use common cpu arch for cross files

2023-12-04 Thread Joyce Kong
The cpu info in some cross files is inconsistent with that in SoC flags. The mismatch doesn't cause any issue because the cpu field in the cross file takes no effect and machine_args in config/arm/meson.build actually works. Use a common one in cross files to remove any confusion. Reported-by: Hon