Hi Stephen,
On 2023/11/7 0:19, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 15:13:35 +0800
> fengchengwen wrote:
>
+
>>>
>>> Looks good but may I suggest some alternatives.
>>>
>>> Since this is an API and ABI change as was not announced, maybe a little
>>> late
>>> in the process for t
On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 15:13:35 +0800
fengchengwen wrote:
> >> +
> >
> > Looks good but may I suggest some alternatives.
> >
> > Since this is an API and ABI change as was not announced, maybe a little
> > late
> > in the process for this release. And since unlikely to go in 23.11 need to
> > d
Hi Stephen,
On 2023/11/6 11:18, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Nov 2023 05:45:35 +
> Chengwen Feng wrote:
>
>> +* **Updated kvargs process API.**
>> +
>> + * Introduced rte_kvargs_process_opt() API, which inherits the function
>> +of rte_kvargs_process() and could handle both key=
On Sun, 5 Nov 2023 05:45:35 +
Chengwen Feng wrote:
> +* **Updated kvargs process API.**
> +
> + * Introduced rte_kvargs_process_opt() API, which inherits the function
> +of rte_kvargs_process() and could handle both key=value and only-key
> +cases.
> +
> + * Constraint rte_kvargs_pr
The rte_kvargs_process() was used to handle key=value (e.g.
socket_id=0), it also supports to handle only-key (e.g. socket_id).
But many drivers's callback can only handle key=value, it will segment
fault if handles only-key. so the patchset [1] was introduced.
Because the patchset [1] modified to
5 matches
Mail list logo
