16/10/2024 08:32, Dmitry Kozlyuk:
> 2024-10-15 16:04 (UTC-0700), Stephen Hemminger:
> > This looks ok, but I know nothing about windows drivers.
> > Could we get a review by Dmitry?
>
> v3 got Reviewed-by almost a year ago, v4 only did a bit of renaming:
>
> http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/202311
2024-10-15 16:04 (UTC-0700), Stephen Hemminger:
> This looks ok, but I know nothing about windows drivers.
> Could we get a review by Dmitry?
v3 got Reviewed-by almost a year ago, v4 only did a bit of renaming:
http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/20231130071001.4c7931c8@sovereign/
There were no ot
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 18:32:14 +0800
Ric Li wrote:
> The virt2phys_translate function previously scanned existing blocks,
> returning the physical address from the stored MDL info if present.
> This method was problematic when a virtual address pointed to a freed
> and reallocated memory segment, p
The virt2phys_translate function previously scanned existing blocks,
returning the physical address from the stored MDL info if present.
This method was problematic when a virtual address pointed to a freed
and reallocated memory segment, potentially changing the physical
address mapping. Yet, virt
The virt2phys_translate function previously scanned existing blocks,
returning the physical address from the stored MDL info if present.
This method was problematic when a virtual address pointed to a freed
and reallocated memory segment, potentially changing the physical
address mapping. Yet, virt
5 matches
Mail list logo
