On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 1:48 PM Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>
> On 2/17/2022 12:44 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 10:48 AM Ciara Loftus wrote:
> >> @@ -1836,6 +2008,17 @@ rte_pmd_af_xdp_probe(struct rte_vdev_device *dev)
> >> return -1;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +
On 2/17/2022 12:44 PM, David Marchand wrote:
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 10:48 AM Ciara Loftus wrote:
@@ -1836,6 +2008,17 @@ rte_pmd_af_xdp_probe(struct rte_vdev_device *dev)
return -1;
}
+ /* Register IPC callback which shares xsk fds from primary to secondary
*/
+
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 10:48 AM Ciara Loftus wrote:
> @@ -1836,6 +2008,17 @@ rte_pmd_af_xdp_probe(struct rte_vdev_device *dev)
> return -1;
> }
>
> + /* Register IPC callback which shares xsk fds from primary to
> secondary */
> + if (!afxdp_dev_count) {
> +
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v4] net/af_xdp: re-enable secondary process support
>
> >
> > On 2/11/2022 1:01 PM, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 2/11/2022 9:26 AM, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On 2/10/2
>
> On 2/11/2022 1:01 PM, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2/11/2022 9:26 AM, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 2/10/2022 5:47 PM, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] net/af_xdp: re-enab
On 2/9/2022 3:29 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 09:48:08 +
Ciara Loftus wrote:
Secondary process support had been disabled for the AF_XDP PMD because
there was no logic in place to share the AF_XDP socket file descriptors
between the processes. This commit introduces this
On 2/11/2022 1:01 PM, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
On 2/11/2022 9:26 AM, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
On 2/10/2022 5:47 PM, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] net/af_xdp: re-enable secondary process
support
On 2/10/2022 3:40 PM, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] net/af_xdp: re
>
> On 2/11/2022 9:26 AM, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 2/10/2022 5:47 PM, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
> >>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] net/af_xdp: re-enable secondary process
> >> support
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
On 2/11/2022 9:26 AM, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
On 2/10/2022 5:47 PM, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] net/af_xdp: re-enable secondary process
support
On 2/10/2022 3:40 PM, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] net/af_xdp: re-enable secondary process
support
On 2/9/2022 9
On 2/11/2022 7:28 AM, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
On 2/10/2022 5:47 PM, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] net/af_xdp: re-enable secondary process support
On 2/10/2022 3:40 PM, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] net/af_xdp: re-enable secondary process
support
On 2/9/2022 9:48
> >
> > On 2/10/2022 5:47 PM, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
> > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] net/af_xdp: re-enable secondary process
> support
> > >>
> > >> On 2/10/2022 3:40 PM, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
> > >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] net/af_
>
> On 2/10/2022 5:47 PM, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] net/af_xdp: re-enable secondary process support
> >>
> >> On 2/10/2022 3:40 PM, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
> >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] net/af_xdp: re-enable secondary pro
On 2/10/2022 5:47 PM, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] net/af_xdp: re-enable secondary process support
On 2/10/2022 3:40 PM, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] net/af_xdp: re-enable secondary process support
On 2/9/2022 9:48 AM, Ciara Loftus wrote:
Secondary process
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] net/af_xdp: re-enable secondary process support
>
> On 2/10/2022 3:40 PM, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] net/af_xdp: re-enable secondary process support
> >>
> >> On 2/9/2022 9:48 AM, Ciara Loftus wrote:
>
On 2/10/2022 3:40 PM, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] net/af_xdp: re-enable secondary process support
On 2/9/2022 9:48 AM, Ciara Loftus wrote:
Secondary process support had been disabled for the AF_XDP PMD
because
there was no logic in place to share the AF_XDP socket file
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] net/af_xdp: re-enable secondary process support
>
> On 2/9/2022 9:48 AM, Ciara Loftus wrote:
> > Secondary process support had been disabled for the AF_XDP PMD
> because
> > there was no logic in place to share the AF_XDP socket file descriptors
&
On 2/9/2022 9:48 AM, Ciara Loftus wrote:
Secondary process support had been disabled for the AF_XDP PMD because
there was no logic in place to share the AF_XDP socket file descriptors
between the processes. This commit introduces this logic using the IPC
APIs.
Rx and Tx are disabled in the secon
On 2/9/2022 5:55 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
On 2/9/2022 9:48 AM, Ciara Loftus wrote:
Secondary process support had been disabled for the AF_XDP PMD because
there was no logic in place to share the AF_XDP socket file descriptors
between the processes. This commit introduces this logic using the IPC
On 2/9/2022 9:48 AM, Ciara Loftus wrote:
Secondary process support had been disabled for the AF_XDP PMD because
there was no logic in place to share the AF_XDP socket file descriptors
between the processes. This commit introduces this logic using the IPC
APIs.
Rx and Tx are disabled in the secon
On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 09:48:08 +
Ciara Loftus wrote:
> Secondary process support had been disabled for the AF_XDP PMD because
> there was no logic in place to share the AF_XDP socket file descriptors
> between the processes. This commit introduces this logic using the IPC
> APIs.
>
> Rx and Tx
Secondary process support had been disabled for the AF_XDP PMD because
there was no logic in place to share the AF_XDP socket file descriptors
between the processes. This commit introduces this logic using the IPC
APIs.
Rx and Tx are disabled in the secondary process due to memory mapping of
the A
21 matches
Mail list logo
