On 11. 6. 2024 17:33, Jeremy Spewock wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 5:17 AM Juraj Linkeš wrote:
On 10. 6. 2024 22:06, Jeremy Spewock wrote:
Overall, my thoughts are that it's definitely an interesting idea to
make the normal shell subclass the critical. I explain more below, but
basicall
On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 5:17 AM Juraj Linkeš wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10. 6. 2024 22:06, Jeremy Spewock wrote:
> > Overall, my thoughts are that it's definitely an interesting idea to
> > make the normal shell subclass the critical. I explain more below, but
> > basically I think it makes sense as long a
On 10. 6. 2024 22:06, Jeremy Spewock wrote:
Overall, my thoughts are that it's definitely an interesting idea to
make the normal shell subclass the critical. I explain more below, but
basically I think it makes sense as long as we are fine with the
normal shells having a context manager which
Overall, my thoughts are that it's definitely an interesting idea to
make the normal shell subclass the critical. I explain more below, but
basically I think it makes sense as long as we are fine with the
normal shells having a context manager which likely won't really be
used since it doesn't real
It seems to me the patch would benefit from Luca's testpmd changes,
mainly how the Shell is created. Not sure if we actually want to do that
with this series, but it sound enticing.
diff --git a/dts/framework/remote_session/critical_interactive_shell.py
b/dts/framework/remote_session/critical
From: Jeremy Spewock
Interactive shells are managed in a way currently where they are closed
and cleaned up at the time of garbage collection. Due to there being no
guarantee of when this garbage collection happens in Python, there is no
way to consistently know when an application will be closed
6 matches
Mail list logo
