> -Original Message-
> From: Eelco Chaudron
> Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2023 7:14 PM
> To: Maxime Coquelin
> Cc: Xia, Chenbo ; david.march...@redhat.com;
> dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] vhost: change vhost_virtqueue access lock to a
> read/write one
&
Chenbo ;
>>> david.march...@redhat.com
>>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
>>> Subject: [PATCH v3 1/4] vhost: change vhost_virtqueue access lock to a
>>> read/write one
>>>
>>> This change will allow the vhost interrupt datapath handling to be split
>
On 5/31/23 08:37, Xia, Chenbo wrote:
Hi Eelco,
-Original Message-
From: Eelco Chaudron
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2023 5:09 PM
To: maxime.coque...@redhat.com; Xia, Chenbo ;
david.march...@redhat.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/4] vhost: change vhost_virtqueue access lock to
Hi Eelco,
> -Original Message-
> From: Eelco Chaudron
> Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2023 5:09 PM
> To: maxime.coque...@redhat.com; Xia, Chenbo ;
> david.march...@redhat.com
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH v3 1/4] vhost: change vhost_virtqueue access lock to a
>
On 17 May 2023, at 19:33, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> Hi Eelco,
>
> On 5/17/23 11:08, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>> This change will allow the vhost interrupt datapath handling to be split
>> between two processed without one of them holding an explicit lock.
>>
>
> As I had a tuned PVP benchmarking se
Hi Eelco,
On 5/17/23 11:08, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
This change will allow the vhost interrupt datapath handling to be split
between two processed without one of them holding an explicit lock.
As I had a tuned PVP benchmarking setup at hand, I ran a 0.02% loss
RFC2544 test with and without this
This change will allow the vhost interrupt datapath handling to be split
between two processed without one of them holding an explicit lock.
Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron
---
lib/eal/include/generic/rte_rwlock.h | 17 ++
lib/vhost/vhost.c| 46 +
lib/vh
7 matches
Mail list logo
