Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] eal: deprecate old coremask-based EAL parameters

2025-06-13 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 08:51:22AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Fri, 2 May 2025 16:11:31 +0100 > Bruce Richardson wrote: > > > As the number of cores/cpus on platforms has increased over the years, > > the use of coremasks rather than core-lists for identifying DPDK cores > > has become

RE: [PATCH v3 1/4] eal: deprecate old coremask-based EAL parameters

2025-05-02 Thread Morten Brørup
> From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com] > Sent: Friday, 2 May 2025 18.01 > > On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 08:51:22AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > On Fri, 2 May 2025 16:11:31 +0100 > > Bruce Richardson wrote: > > > > > As the number of cores/cpus on platforms has increased

Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] eal: deprecate old coremask-based EAL parameters

2025-05-02 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 08:51:22AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Fri, 2 May 2025 16:11:31 +0100 > Bruce Richardson wrote: > > > As the number of cores/cpus on platforms has increased over the years, > > the use of coremasks rather than core-lists for identifying DPDK cores > > has become

Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] eal: deprecate old coremask-based EAL parameters

2025-05-02 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Fri, 2 May 2025 16:11:31 +0100 Bruce Richardson wrote: > As the number of cores/cpus on platforms has increased over the years, > the use of coremasks rather than core-lists for identifying DPDK cores > has become more and more unwieldy. At this point, let's deprecate the > coremask-based EAL

[PATCH v3 1/4] eal: deprecate old coremask-based EAL parameters

2025-05-02 Thread Bruce Richardson
As the number of cores/cpus on platforms has increased over the years, the use of coremasks rather than core-lists for identifying DPDK cores has become more and more unwieldy. At this point, let's deprecate the coremask-based EAL parameters for future removal, and point users to the core-list base