RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] config/arm: strict use of -mcpu for supported CPUs

2024-11-11 Thread Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
> > Hi Thomas, > > > > CI is failing because gcc version 11 does not enable crypto extension > > for thunderx2, with -mcpu=thunderx2t99 unless +crypto feature modifier is > used. > > Goal of this patch is to drop use of such feature modifiers when an > > -mcpu is available for a given platform. > >

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] config/arm: strict use of -mcpu for supported CPUs

2024-11-11 Thread Thomas Monjalon
11/11/2024 18:57, Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage: > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] config/arm: strict use of -mcpu for supported > > CPUs > > > > Please check the CI results, there are some failures. > > > > Hi Thomas, > > CI is failing because gc

RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] config/arm: strict use of -mcpu for supported CPUs

2024-11-11 Thread Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] config/arm: strict use of -mcpu for supported > CPUs > > Please check the CI results, there are some failures. > Hi Thomas, CI is failing because gcc version 11 does not enable crypto extension for thunderx2, with -mcpu=thunderx2t99 unless

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] config/arm: strict use of -mcpu for supported CPUs

2024-11-11 Thread Thomas Monjalon
Please check the CI results, there are some failures. 29/10/2024 02:59, Wathsala Vithanage: > Arm recommends using -mcpu over -march and march-extensions when the > compiler supports the target CPU (neoverse-n1 etc.). Arm build so far > has been an amalgam of -mcpu and -march. When march is in us

[PATCH v2 1/2] config/arm: strict use of -mcpu for supported CPUs

2024-10-28 Thread Wathsala Vithanage
Arm recommends using -mcpu over -march and march-extensions when the compiler supports the target CPU (neoverse-n1 etc.). Arm build so far has been an amalgam of -mcpu and -march. When march is in use, it has been the case so far to silently fall back to a downgraded march when the compiler does no