On 3/25/2024 10:58 AM, Bing Zhao wrote:
> The memory of the indirect action handles should be freed after
> being destroyed in the flush. The behavior needs to be consistent
> with the single handle destroy port_action_handle_destroy().
>
> Or else, there would be some memory leak when closing / d
The memory of the indirect action handles should be freed after
being destroyed in the flush. The behavior needs to be consistent
with the single handle destroy port_action_handle_destroy().
Or else, there would be some memory leak when closing / detaching a
port without quitting the application.
2 matches
Mail list logo
