RE: [EXT] [PATCH v1 1/1] test: fix named test macro

2023-09-06 Thread Akhil Goyal
> Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH v1 1/1] test: fix named test macro > > > Currently, the TEST_CASE_NAMED_ST macro is implemented in a way that is > > identical to TEST_CASE_NAMED_WITH_DATA. In particular, it expects the > > test function to have a data argument, which is why

RE: [EXT] [PATCH v1 1/1] test: fix named test macro

2023-08-23 Thread Anoob Joseph
> Currently, the TEST_CASE_NAMED_ST macro is implemented in a way that is > identical to TEST_CASE_NAMED_WITH_DATA. In particular, it expects the > test function to have a data argument, which is why a bunch of tests have an > unused data arguments. > > Fix this by adjusting the macro to not expec

Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] test: fix named test macro

2023-08-23 Thread Hemant Agrawal
Acked-by: Hemant Agrawal

RE: [EXT] [PATCH v1 1/1] test: fix named test macro

2023-08-23 Thread Akhil Goyal
> Currently, the TEST_CASE_NAMED_ST macro is implemented in a way that > is identical to TEST_CASE_NAMED_WITH_DATA. In particular, it expects > the test function to have a data argument, which is why a bunch of tests > have an unused data arguments. > > Fix this by adjusting the macro to not expec

[PATCH v1 1/1] test: fix named test macro

2023-08-23 Thread Anatoly Burakov
Currently, the TEST_CASE_NAMED_ST macro is implemented in a way that is identical to TEST_CASE_NAMED_WITH_DATA. In particular, it expects the test function to have a data argument, which is why a bunch of tests have an unused data arguments. Fix this by adjusting the macro to not expect a test fun