RE: [PATCH v1 0/5] Direct re-arming of buffers on receive side

2022-07-01 Thread Morten Brørup
> From: Honnappa Nagarahalli [mailto:honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com] > Sent: Friday, 1 July 2022 21.31 > > > > > > > > > > > > > 16/05/2022 07:10, Feifei Wang пишет: > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Currently, the transmit side frees the buffers into the > > > lcore > > > > > >>> ca

RE: [PATCH v1 0/5] Direct re-arming of buffers on receive side

2022-07-01 Thread Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > > > > > > > 16/05/2022 07:10, Feifei Wang пишет: > > > > > > > > > >>> Currently, the transmit side frees the buffers into the > > lcore > > > > >>> cache and the receive side allocates buffers from the > > > > >>> lcore > > > > cache. > > > > >>> The transmit si

RE: [PATCH v1 0/5] Direct re-arming of buffers on receive side

2022-06-30 Thread Morten Brørup
> From: Honnappa Nagarahalli [mailto:honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com] > Sent: Wednesday, 29 June 2022 23.58 > > > > > > > > > 16/05/2022 07:10, Feifei Wang пишет: > > > > > > > >>> Currently, the transmit side frees the buffers into the > lcore > > > >>> cache and the receive

RE: [PATCH v1 0/5] Direct re-arming of buffers on receive side

2022-06-29 Thread Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > >>> > > > > [konstantin.v.anan...@yandex.ru appears similar to someone who > > previously sent you email, but may not be that person. Learn why > > this > > could be a risk at > > https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification.] > > > > 16/05/2022 07:10, Feif

回复: [PATCH v1 0/5] Direct re-arming of buffers on receive side

2022-06-12 Thread Feifei Wang
> -邮件原件- > 发件人: Konstantin Ananyev > 发送时间: Tuesday, May 24, 2022 9:26 AM > 收件人: Feifei Wang > 抄送: nd ; dev@dpdk.org; Ruifeng Wang > ; Honnappa Nagarahalli > > 主题: Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] Direct re-arming of buffers on receive side > > [konstantin.v.anan..

RE: [PATCH v1 0/5] Direct re-arming of buffers on receive side

2022-06-04 Thread Morten Brørup
> From: Konstantin Ananyev [mailto:konstantin.v.anan...@yandex.ru] > Sent: Saturday, 4 June 2022 01.32 > > > > >>> > > [konstantin.v.anan...@yandex.ru appears similar to someone who > previously sent you email, but may not be that person. Learn why > this > could be a risk at

Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] Direct re-arming of buffers on receive side

2022-06-03 Thread Konstantin Ananyev
[konstantin.v.anan...@yandex.ru appears similar to someone who previously sent you email, but may not be that person. Learn why this could be a risk at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification.] 16/05/2022 07:10, Feifei Wang пишет: Currently, the transmit side frees the buffers in

RE: [PATCH v1 0/5] Direct re-arming of buffers on receive side

2022-05-31 Thread Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > > >> > >> [konstantin.v.anan...@yandex.ru appears similar to someone who > >> previously sent you email, but may not be that person. Learn why this > >> could be a risk at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification.] > >> > >> 16/05/2022 07:10, Feifei Wang пишет: > >>> > > Currently, th

Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] Direct re-arming of buffers on receive side

2022-05-28 Thread Konstantin Ananyev
24/05/2022 21:14, Honnappa Nagarahalli пишет: [konstantin.v.anan...@yandex.ru appears similar to someone who previously sent you email, but may not be that person. Learn why this could be a risk at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification.] 16/05/2022 07:10, Feifei Wang пишет: Curren

RE: [PATCH v1 0/5] Direct re-arming of buffers on receive side

2022-05-24 Thread Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > [konstantin.v.anan...@yandex.ru appears similar to someone who > previously sent you email, but may not be that person. Learn why this could > be a risk at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification.] > > 16/05/2022 07:10, Feifei Wang пишет: > > > >>> Currently, the transmit side frees t

RE: [PATCH v1 0/5] Direct re-arming of buffers on receive side

2022-05-24 Thread Morten Brørup
> From: Konstantin Ananyev [mailto:konstantin.v.anan...@yandex.ru] > Sent: Tuesday, 24 May 2022 03.26 > > Furtrhermore, I think this is a tradeoff between performance and > > flexibility. > > Our goal is to achieve best performance, this means we need to give > up some > > flexibility decisively.

Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] Direct re-arming of buffers on receive side

2022-05-23 Thread Konstantin Ananyev
16/05/2022 07:10, Feifei Wang пишет: Currently, the transmit side frees the buffers into the lcore cache and the receive side allocates buffers from the lcore cache. The transmit side typically frees 32 buffers resulting in 32*8=256B of stores to lcore cache. The receive side allocates 32 buffe

Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] Direct re-arming of buffers on receive side

2022-05-11 Thread Konstantin Ananyev
Currently, the transmit side frees the buffers into the lcore cache and the receive side allocates buffers from the lcore cache. The transmit side typically frees 32 buffers resulting in 32*8=256B of stores to lcore cache. The receive side allocates 32 buffers and stores them in the receive sid

[PATCH v1 0/5] Direct re-arming of buffers on receive side

2022-04-20 Thread Feifei Wang
Currently, the transmit side frees the buffers into the lcore cache and the receive side allocates buffers from the lcore cache. The transmit side typically frees 32 buffers resulting in 32*8=256B of stores to lcore cache. The receive side allocates 32 buffers and stores them in the receive side so