a...@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] drivers: fix incorrect E-Switch manager vport ID
>
> On 2/23/2022 2:39 PM, Raslan Darawsheh wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Shun Hao
> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 5
: [PATCH v1] drivers: fix incorrect E-Switch manager vport ID
One of the E-Switch vports plays the special role - it is assigned as "E-Switch
manager" and has some special exclusive rights and duties - it maintains all
the representors, manages FDB domain flows, etc. By default, the E-Sw
ct: [PATCH v1] drivers: fix incorrect E-Switch manager vport ID
>
> One of the E-Switch vports plays the special role - it is assigned as
> "E-Switch
> manager" and has some special exclusive rights and duties - it maintains all
> the representors, manages FDB domain flows, etc.
One of the E-Switch vports plays the special role - it is assigned as
"E-Switch manager" and has some special exclusive rights and duties - it
maintains all the representors, manages FDB domain flows, etc. By
default, the E-Switch vport index was supposed to be zero on standalone
NICs (regular Conn
One of the E-Switch vports plays the special role - it is assigned as
"E-Switch manager" and has some special exclusive rights and duties - it
maintains all the representors, manages FDB domain flows, etc. By
default, the E-Switch vport index was supposed to be zero on standalone
NICs (regular Conn
5 matches
Mail list logo
