Tested-by: Nicholas Pratte
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Pratte
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 3:04 PM Luca Vizzarro wrote:
>
> Make it so that interactive shells accept an implementation of `Params`
> for app arguments. Convert EalParameters to use `Params` instead.
>
> String command line parameters can sti
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 11:34 AM Luca Vizzarro wrote:
>
> On 09/04/2024 15:56, Juraj Linkeš wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 5:48 PM Jeremy Spewock wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm not sure if allowing None should be the solution for these shells
> >> as opposed to just supplying an empty parameter object.
On 09/04/2024 15:56, Juraj Linkeš wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 5:48 PM Jeremy Spewock wrote:
I'm not sure if allowing None should be the solution for these shells
as opposed to just supplying an empty parameter object. Maybe
something that could be done is the factory method in sut_node allo
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 5:48 PM Jeremy Spewock wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 3:04 PM Luca Vizzarro wrote:
> >
> > Make it so that interactive shells accept an implementation of `Params`
> > for app arguments. Convert EalParameters to use `Params` instead.
> >
> > String command line paramete
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 3:04 PM Luca Vizzarro wrote:
>
> Make it so that interactive shells accept an implementation of `Params`
> for app arguments. Convert EalParameters to use `Params` instead.
>
> String command line parameters can still be supplied by using the
> `StrParams` implementation.
>
Make it so that interactive shells accept an implementation of `Params`
for app arguments. Convert EalParameters to use `Params` instead.
String command line parameters can still be supplied by using the
`StrParams` implementation.
Signed-off-by: Luca Vizzarro
Reviewed-by: Jack Bond-Preston
Rev
6 matches
Mail list logo
