On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 08:04:00PM +0300, Isaac Boukris wrote:
> Perhaps this was a bit hastily, I got an automated failure report on
> "arm64-native-linuxapp-gcc":
>
> https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/31106/
>
That might be a false positive failure. I don't see how this patch co
Perhaps this was a bit hastily, I got an automated failure report on
"arm64-native-linuxapp-gcc":
https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/31106/
Not sure which patch caused the problem, looking at the kernel code it
looks like 'tsc_known_freq' is only set for x86 arch, but it could be
th
If the tsc_known_freq cpu flag is missing, it means the kernel doesn't
trust it and calculates its own. We should do the same to avoid drift.
Signed-off-by: Isaac Boukris
---
lib/eal/common/eal_common_timer.c | 3 +-
lib/eal/common/eal_private.h | 2 +-
lib/eal/freebsd/eal_timer.c |
3 matches
Mail list logo