> -Original Message-
> From: Juraj Linkeš
> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2024 9:59 PM
> To: Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
> Cc: Jerin Jacob ; ruifeng.w...@arm.com;
> n...@arm.com; Bruce Richardson ;
> dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 2/2] config/arm:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 1:16 PM Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 10:37 AM wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Pavan Nikhilesh
> > >
> > > Some ARM CPUs have specific march requirements and
> > > are not compatible with the supported march list.
> > > Add fallback march in ca
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 10:37 AM wrote:
> >
> > From: Pavan Nikhilesh
> >
> > Some ARM CPUs have specific march requirements and
> > are not compatible with the supported march list.
> > Add fallback march in case the mcpu and the march
> > advertised in the part_number_config are not supported
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 10:37 AM wrote:
>
> From: Pavan Nikhilesh
>
> Some ARM CPUs have specific march requirements and
> are not compatible with the supported march list.
> Add fallback march in case the mcpu and the march
> advertised in the part_number_config are not supported
> by the compil
+Cc
On 2024/1/21 5:36 PM, pbhagavat...@marvell.com wrote:
From: Pavan Nikhilesh
Some ARM CPUs have specific march requirements and
are not compatible with the supported march list.
Add fallback march in case the mcpu and the march
advertised in the part_number_config are not supported
by the c
From: Pavan Nikhilesh
Some ARM CPUs have specific march requirements and
are not compatible with the supported march list.
Add fallback march in case the mcpu and the march
advertised in the part_number_config are not supported
by the compiler.
Example
mcpu = neoverse-n2
march =
6 matches
Mail list logo
