Re: [PATCH 1/1] dts: add binding to different drivers to TG node

2024-09-19 Thread Juraj Linkeš
On 18. 9. 2024 20:50, Jeremy Spewock wrote: On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 6:04 AM Juraj Linkeš wrote: On 9. 9. 2024 17:55, Jeremy Spewock wrote: On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 8:16 AM Juraj Linkeš wrote: On 12. 8. 2024 19:22, jspew...@iol.unh.edu wrote: From: Jeremy Spewock The DTS framework i

Re: [PATCH 1/1] dts: add binding to different drivers to TG node

2024-09-18 Thread Jeremy Spewock
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 6:04 AM Juraj Linkeš wrote: > > > > On 9. 9. 2024 17:55, Jeremy Spewock wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 8:16 AM Juraj Linkeš > > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On 12. 8. 2024 19:22, jspew...@iol.unh.edu wrote: > >>> From: Jeremy Spewock > >>> > >>> The DTS framework in its

Re: [PATCH 1/1] dts: add binding to different drivers to TG node

2024-09-16 Thread Juraj Linkeš
On 9. 9. 2024 17:55, Jeremy Spewock wrote: On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 8:16 AM Juraj Linkeš wrote: On 12. 8. 2024 19:22, jspew...@iol.unh.edu wrote: From: Jeremy Spewock The DTS framework in its current state supports binding ports to different drivers on the SUT node but not the TG node. T

Re: [PATCH 1/1] dts: add binding to different drivers to TG node

2024-09-12 Thread Patrick Robb
Looks good to me, and I don't understand it as triggering a second compile on the TG node. I wonder whether the docstring for set_up_build_target() makes it sound like it does though? Reviewed-by: Patrick Robb

Re: [PATCH 1/1] dts: add binding to different drivers to TG node

2024-09-09 Thread Jeremy Spewock
On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 8:16 AM Juraj Linkeš wrote: > > > > On 12. 8. 2024 19:22, jspew...@iol.unh.edu wrote: > > From: Jeremy Spewock > > > > The DTS framework in its current state supports binding ports to > > different drivers on the SUT node but not the TG node. The TG node > > already has the

Re: [PATCH 1/1] dts: add binding to different drivers to TG node

2024-09-09 Thread Juraj Linkeš
On 12. 8. 2024 19:22, jspew...@iol.unh.edu wrote: From: Jeremy Spewock The DTS framework in its current state supports binding ports to different drivers on the SUT node but not the TG node. The TG node already has the information that it needs about the different drivers that it has availab

Re: [PATCH 1/1] dts: add binding to different drivers to TG node

2024-08-12 Thread Nicholas Pratte
Makes sense to me! Reviewed-by: Nicholas Pratte On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 1:23 PM wrote: > > From: Jeremy Spewock > > The DTS framework in its current state supports binding ports to > different drivers on the SUT node but not the TG node. The TG node > already has the information that it needs

[PATCH 1/1] dts: add binding to different drivers to TG node

2024-08-12 Thread jspewock
From: Jeremy Spewock The DTS framework in its current state supports binding ports to different drivers on the SUT node but not the TG node. The TG node already has the information that it needs about the different drivers that it has available in the configuration file, but it did not previously