14/06/2023 16:46, Bruce Richardson:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 04:26:46PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > While pulling some trees for DPDK 23.07-rc1,
> > I've seen that some wrong coding style for comments
> > were copied over and over.
> >
> > In order to avoid copying wrong comment style,
> >
14/06/2023 17:08, David Marchand:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 4:42 PM Jerin Jacob wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 8:01 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > >
> > > While pulling some trees for DPDK 23.07-rc1,
> > > I've seen that some wrong coding style for comments
> > > were copied over and over.
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 4:42 PM Jerin Jacob wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 8:01 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >
> > While pulling some trees for DPDK 23.07-rc1,
> > I've seen that some wrong coding style for comments
> > were copied over and over.
> >
> > In order to avoid copying wrong comment
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 04:26:46PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> While pulling some trees for DPDK 23.07-rc1,
> I've seen that some wrong coding style for comments
> were copied over and over.
>
> In order to avoid copying wrong comment style,
> the three first patches are fixing a lot of commen
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 8:01 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> While pulling some trees for DPDK 23.07-rc1,
> I've seen that some wrong coding style for comments
> were copied over and over.
>
> In order to avoid copying wrong comment style,
> the three first patches are fixing a lot of comments.
> As
While pulling some trees for DPDK 23.07-rc1,
I've seen that some wrong coding style for comments
were copied over and over.
In order to avoid copying wrong comment style,
the three first patches are fixing a lot of comments.
As it is not critical, they are not marked for backport.
While looking t
6 matches
Mail list logo
