Re: [PATCH 0/1] make file prefix unit test more resilient

2023-09-26 Thread Aaron Conole
Bruce Richardson writes: > On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 10:21:04AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >> 22/09/2023 15:23, Bruce Richardson: >> > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 02:57:32PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >> > > 20/09/2023 12:09, Bruce Richardson: >> > > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 12:00:08PM +0200, Da

Re: [PATCH 0/1] make file prefix unit test more resilient

2023-09-25 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 10:21:04AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 22/09/2023 15:23, Bruce Richardson: > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 02:57:32PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > 20/09/2023 12:09, Bruce Richardson: > > > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 12:00:08PM +0200, David Marchand wrote: > > > > > On

Re: [PATCH 0/1] make file prefix unit test more resilient

2023-09-23 Thread Thomas Monjalon
22/09/2023 15:23, Bruce Richardson: > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 02:57:32PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 20/09/2023 12:09, Bruce Richardson: > > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 12:00:08PM +0200, David Marchand wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 12:42 PM Bruce Richardson > > > > wrote: > > > > > >

Re: [PATCH 0/1] make file prefix unit test more resilient

2023-09-22 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 02:57:32PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 20/09/2023 12:09, Bruce Richardson: > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 12:00:08PM +0200, David Marchand wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 12:42 PM Bruce Richardson > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > When examining the IOL testing failures fo

Re: [PATCH 0/1] make file prefix unit test more resilient

2023-09-22 Thread Thomas Monjalon
20/09/2023 12:09, Bruce Richardson: > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 12:00:08PM +0200, David Marchand wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 12:42 PM Bruce Richardson > > wrote: > > > > > > When examining the IOL testing failures for patch series [1], I observed > > > that the failures reported were in the e

Re: [PATCH 0/1] make file prefix unit test more resilient

2023-09-20 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 12:00:08PM +0200, David Marchand wrote: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 12:42 PM Bruce Richardson > wrote: > > > > When examining the IOL testing failures for patch series [1], I observed > > that the failures reported were in the eal_flags_file_prefix unit test. > > I was able t

Re: [PATCH 0/1] make file prefix unit test more resilient

2023-09-20 Thread David Marchand
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 12:42 PM Bruce Richardson wrote: > > When examining the IOL testing failures for patch series [1], I observed > that the failures reported were in the eal_flags_file_prefix unit test. > I was able to reproduce this on my system by passing an additional > "--on-pci" flag to

[PATCH 0/1] make file prefix unit test more resilient

2023-09-14 Thread Bruce Richardson
When examining the IOL testing failures for patch series [1], I observed that the failures reported were in the eal_flags_file_prefix unit test. I was able to reproduce this on my system by passing an additional "--on-pci" flag to the test run, since the log to the test has errors about device avai