Re: [PATCH] net/nfp: support 48-bit DMA address for firmware with NFDk

2023-02-16 Thread Ferruh Yigit
>> Boccassi ; oss-drivers ; Nole >> Zhang ; Kevin Liu ; >> sta...@dpdk.org >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/nfp: support 48-bit DMA address for firmware with >> NFDk >> >> On 2/16/2023 10:41 AM, Chaoyong He wrote: >>> >>> >>>> -Origin

RE: [PATCH] net/nfp: support 48-bit DMA address for firmware with NFDk

2023-02-16 Thread Nole Zhang
023 6:37 PM > >> To: Kevin Traynor > >> Cc: Ferruh Yigit ; Xueming(Steven) Li > >> ; Chaoyong He ; > >> dev@dpdk.org; Luca Boccassi ; oss-drivers >> driv...@corigine.com>; Nole Zhang ; Kevin > >> Liu ; sta...@dpdk.org > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/n

Re: [PATCH] net/nfp: support 48-bit DMA address for firmware with NFDk

2023-02-16 Thread Ferruh Yigit
dev@dpdk.org; Luca Boccassi ; oss-drivers > driv...@corigine.com>; Nole Zhang ; Kevin Liu >> ; sta...@dpdk.org >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/nfp: support 48-bit DMA address for firmware with >> NFDk >> >> Hi Kevin, >> >> Thanks for your input. >> >> On 2023

Re: [PATCH] net/nfp: support 48-bit DMA address for firmware with NFDk

2023-02-16 Thread Niklas Soderlund
He ; > > dev@dpdk.org; Luca Boccassi ; oss-drivers > driv...@corigine.com>; Nole Zhang ; Kevin Liu > > ; sta...@dpdk.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/nfp: support 48-bit DMA address for firmware with > > NFDk > > > > Hi Kevin, > > > > Thanks fo

RE: [PATCH] net/nfp: support 48-bit DMA address for firmware with NFDk

2023-02-16 Thread Chaoyong He
Liu > ; sta...@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/nfp: support 48-bit DMA address for firmware with > NFDk > > Hi Kevin, > > Thanks for your input. > > On 2023-02-16 10:28:34 +, Kevin Traynor wrote: > > On 15/02/2023 18:28, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > > &g

Re: [PATCH] net/nfp: support 48-bit DMA address for firmware with NFDk

2023-02-16 Thread Niklas Söderlund
Hi Kevin, Thanks for your input. On 2023-02-16 10:28:34 +, Kevin Traynor wrote: > On 15/02/2023 18:28, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > > On 2/15/2023 5:47 PM, Niklas Söderlund wrote: > > > Hi Ferruh, > > > > > > Thanks for your continues effort in dealing with NFP patches. > > > > > > On 2023-02-15 1

Re: [PATCH] net/nfp: support 48-bit DMA address for firmware with NFDk

2023-02-16 Thread Kevin Traynor
On 15/02/2023 18:28, Ferruh Yigit wrote: On 2/15/2023 5:47 PM, Niklas Söderlund wrote: Hi Ferruh, Thanks for your continues effort in dealing with NFP patches. On 2023-02-15 13:42:01 +, Ferruh Yigit wrote: On 2/8/2023 9:15 AM, Chaoyong He wrote: From: Peng Zhang 48-bit DMA address is s

Re: [PATCH] net/nfp: support 48-bit DMA address for firmware with NFDk

2023-02-15 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 2/15/2023 5:47 PM, Niklas Söderlund wrote: > Hi Ferruh, > > Thanks for your continues effort in dealing with NFP patches. > > On 2023-02-15 13:42:01 +, Ferruh Yigit wrote: >> On 2/8/2023 9:15 AM, Chaoyong He wrote: >>> From: Peng Zhang >>> >>> 48-bit DMA address is supported in the firmwa

Re: [PATCH] net/nfp: support 48-bit DMA address for firmware with NFDk

2023-02-15 Thread Niklas Söderlund
Hi Ferruh, Thanks for your continues effort in dealing with NFP patches. On 2023-02-15 13:42:01 +, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 2/8/2023 9:15 AM, Chaoyong He wrote: > > From: Peng Zhang > > > > 48-bit DMA address is supported in the firmware with NFDk, so enable > > this feature in PMD now. But

Re: [PATCH] net/nfp: support 48-bit DMA address for firmware with NFDk

2023-02-15 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 2/8/2023 9:15 AM, Chaoyong He wrote: > From: Peng Zhang > > 48-bit DMA address is supported in the firmware with NFDk, so enable > this feature in PMD now. But the firmware with NFD3 still just > support 40-bit DMA address. > > RX free list descriptor, used by both NFD3 and NFDk, is also modi

[PATCH] net/nfp: support 48-bit DMA address for firmware with NFDk

2023-02-08 Thread Chaoyong He
From: Peng Zhang 48-bit DMA address is supported in the firmware with NFDk, so enable this feature in PMD now. But the firmware with NFD3 still just support 40-bit DMA address. RX free list descriptor, used by both NFD3 and NFDk, is also modified to support 48-bit DMA address. That's OK because