Re: [PATCH] net/ixgbe: don't create a delayed interrupt handler if one already exists

2024-05-21 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 01:41:22PM +0200, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: > On 4/18/2024 3:53 PM, edwin.brosse...@6wind.com wrote: > > From: Edwin Brossette > > > > Since link state may need some time to stabilize after a link state > > change, we cannot update the link state right after one occurs. So l

Re: [PATCH] net/ixgbe: don't create a delayed interrupt handler if one already exists

2024-05-16 Thread Burakov, Anatoly
On 4/18/2024 3:53 PM, edwin.brosse...@6wind.com wrote: From: Edwin Brossette Since link state may need some time to stabilize after a link state change, we cannot update the link state right after one occurs. So link state change interrupts (lsc) are handled after a delay. To do this, an alarm

[PATCH] net/ixgbe: don't create a delayed interrupt handler if one already exists

2024-04-18 Thread edwin . brossette
From: Edwin Brossette Since link state may need some time to stabilize after a link state change, we cannot update the link state right after one occurs. So link state change interrupts (lsc) are handled after a delay. To do this, an alarm to call a delayed handler is programmed. This delayed han