Thomas Monjalon, Nov 26, 2024 at 16:36:
The central question is to know how to get those GPL2 scripts accepted
in DPDK.
These are scripts, not linked to any DPDK related binary. So I think it
is OK in terms of license contamination. We MUST preserve the original
license headers in these impor
26/11/2024 16:16, Robin Jarry:
> Thomas Monjalon, Nov 26, 2024 at 15:03:
> > I would prefer we host our own fork of checkpatch.pl.
> > There are too many irrelevant checks that we should drop.
>
> How about get_maintainer.pl? Should we host our copy as well?
It may makes sense.
The central quest
Thomas Monjalon, Nov 26, 2024 at 15:03:
I would prefer we host our own fork of checkpatch.pl.
There are too many irrelevant checks that we should drop.
How about get_maintainer.pl? Should we host our copy as well?
04/10/2024 18:31, Stephen Hemminger:
> On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:14:42 +0100
> Robin Jarry wrote:
>
> > Both checkpatches.sh and get-maintainer.sh require scripts that come
> > from the linux sources. And they require DPDK_*_PATH variables to be set
> > to point at these scripts locally. For new con
On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:14:42 +0100
Robin Jarry wrote:
> Both checkpatches.sh and get-maintainer.sh require scripts that come
> from the linux sources. And they require DPDK_*_PATH variables to be set
> to point at these scripts locally. For new contributors this can be
> tedious since they will h
Both checkpatches.sh and get-maintainer.sh require scripts that come
from the linux sources. And they require DPDK_*_PATH variables to be set
to point at these scripts locally. For new contributors this can be
tedious since they will have to clone the whole linux sources just to
have simple perl sc
6 matches
Mail list logo