On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 15:20:51 +0100
Alex Chapman wrote:
> To help distinguish packets we want to add more identifiable
> information and print port number for all packets.
> This will make packet metadata more uniform as previously it
> only printed port number for encapsulated packets.
>
> Bugzi
On 16. 8. 2024 13:46, Luca Vizzarro wrote:
On 15/08/2024 16:22, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
The verbose output is already too verbose.
Maybe you would like the simpler format (which does include the port
number)
see the network packet dissector patches.
Hi Stephen,
Thank you for the reply y
On 15/08/2024 16:22, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
The verbose output is already too verbose.
Maybe you would like the simpler format (which does include the port number)
see the network packet dissector patches.
Hi Stephen,
Thank you for the reply you left to Alex's patch. This is actually quite
On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 15:20:51 +0100
Alex Chapman wrote:
> To help distinguish packets we want to add more identifiable
> information and print port number for all packets.
> This will make packet metadata more uniform as previously it
> only printed port number for encapsulated packets.
>
> Bugzi
To help distinguish packets we want to add more identifiable
information and print port number for all packets.
This will make packet metadata more uniform as previously it
only printed port number for encapsulated packets.
Bugzilla-ID: 1517
Signed-off-by: Alex Chapman
Reviewed-by: Luca Vizzarro
5 matches
Mail list logo