> -Original Message-
> From: lihuisong (C)
> Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2022 9:53 AM
> To: Zhang, Peng1X ; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru; Singh, Aman Deep
> ; Zhang, Yuying ;
> sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] app/testpmd: fix i
age-
> From: Singh, Aman Deep
> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2022 2:22 AM
> To: Zhang, Peng1X ; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Zhang, Yuying ; sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: fix incorrect queues state of secondary
> process
>
> Hi Peng,
>
> On 8/19/2022 3:39
reated as
'IAVF_ERR_NOT_READY'.
> -Original Message-
> From: Zhang, Qi Z
> Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2022 2:56 PM
> To: Zhang, Peng1X ; Yang, Qiming
> ; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v6] net/ice: add retry mechanism for DCF after failure
>
>
>
> > -O
, July 4, 2022 10:37 AM
> To: Zhang, Peng1X ; Andrew Rybchenko
> ; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Singh, Aman Deep ; Zhang, Yuying
> ; sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix secondary process cannot dump packet
>
> Hi Peng1X,
>
> 在 2022/7/1 19:36, Zhang, Peng1X 写道:
rt testpmd?
> -Original Message-
> From: lihuisong (C)
> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2022 10:55 AM
> To: Andrew Rybchenko ; Zhang, Peng1X
> ; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Singh, Aman Deep ; Zhang, Yuying
> ; sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix secondary pro
affect the handling to AdminQ under
DCF. It looks like it will affect much more than following given situation.
> -Original Message-
> From: Zhang, Qi Z
> Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 11:23 AM
> To: Zhang, Peng1X ; Yang, Qiming
> ; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
&
Wednesday, June 1, 2022 9:54 AM
> To: Zhang, Peng1X ; Yang, Qiming
> ; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v4] net/ice: retry sending adminQ command after failure
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Zhang, Peng1X
> > Sent: Wedne
I see, so ice_aq_retry_send_cmd function will conduct whether DCF is enabled
or not with
'hw->dcf_enabled'.
> -Original Message-
> From: Zhang, Qi Z
> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2022 7:52 PM
> To: Zhang, Peng1X ; Yang, Qiming
> ; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: sta...
: Wednesday, May 18, 2022 2:46 PM
> To: Zhang, Peng1X ; Yang, Qiming
> ; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] net/ice: fix DCF state checking mechanism
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Zhang, Peng1X
> > Sent: Wednesda
not EAGAIN.
In conclusion, in upper situation error code which should not be EINVAL and
EAGAIN is expected.
> -Original Message-
> From: Zhang, Qi Z
> Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2022 3:36 PM
> To: Zhang, Peng1X ; Yang, Qiming
> ; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> Subje
Hi Qi,
The Aim of change error code from EAGAIN to EBUSY is to mention user as
reporter wished ' something more along the lines of device being busy '.
Br,
Peng
> -Original Message-
> From: Zhang, Qi Z
> Sent: Saturday, May 7, 2022 3:10 PM
> To: Zhang, Peng1X ;
> -Original Message-
> From: dapengx...@intel.com
> Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 5:00 PM
> To: Xing, Beilei
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Yu, DapengX ; sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH] net/i40e: enable max frame size at port level
>
> From: Dapeng Yu
>
> Currently max frame size is set at q
> -Original Message-
> From: dapengx...@intel.com
> Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 5:00 PM
> To: Xing, Beilei
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Yu, DapengX ; sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH] net/i40e: enable max frame size at port level
>
> From: Dapeng Yu
>
> Currently max frame size is set at q
13 matches
Mail list logo
