.@dpdk.org ? I don't want to cause
confusion now when it's here already.
Br,
Michal.
> -Original Message-
> From: Rosen, Rami
> Sent: Friday, April 13, 2018 9:03 AM
> To: Weglicki, MichalX ; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: Problem with using VF: Initialization Failur
Hello,
I'm trying to test very simple scenario, creating two VFs and testing it with
test-pmd. Unfortunately I can't make it to work
DPDK Version: v17.11 (I've checked also 18.02)
NIC: Niantic 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection 10fb
Kernel: 4.4.0-116-generic #140-Ubuntu SMP Mon Feb 12
Thank you in advance.
Br,
Michal.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monja...@6wind.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 9:53 AM
To: Weglicki, MichalX
Cc: Marc Sune ; Xu, Qian Q ;
Xing, Beilei ; dev at dpdk.org; Ananyev, Konstantin
; Lu, Wenzhuo ;
Richardson,
Hello,
I have a question about this patch.
As far as I see changing ETH_LINK_SPEED_ to ETH_SPEED_NUM_ is rather cosmetic
change, am I right?
Disadvantage of that is that it breaks compatibility with OVS (compilation) and
thus it also breaks backward compatibility between OVS & DPDK. Is it r
Hello,
Currently I'm integrating OVS head with DPDK 2.1. Based on my tests performance
in all scenarios (confirmed on Phy2Phy and Vhostuser) has dropped about 10%.
Please find example results below:
PHY2PHY (Bidirectional)
DPDK 2.1:
Iteration 1: 14,164,987 pps
Iteration 2: 13,866,386 pps
Iterat
5 matches
Mail list logo