Re: [dpdk-dev] librte_power w/ intel_pstate cpufreq governor

t;, I think the better choice should be leaving it to P-State, since driver-controlling is better than user's acknowledgement of hardware state. FYI. Best Regards, Peng On 27 February 2017 at 13:56, Threqn Peng wrote: > Hey guys, > > I have the same problem which

[dpdk-dev] librte_power w/ intel_pstate cpufreq governor

Hey guys, I have the same problem which have been discussed in January 2016(*http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-January/031374.html *), about intel cpu scaling frequency control in linux user space. But it seems no more progress/solut