Re: lib/eal/arm/include/rte_vect.h fails to compile with clang14 for 32bit ARM

clang version 14.0.5 On 12/5/24 2:34 PM, Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage wrote: > What version of CLANG are you using? > >> -Original Message----- >> From: Roger Melton (rmelton) >> Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 11:24 AM >> To: Ruifeng Wang ; dev@dpdk

Re: lib/eal/arm/include/rte_vect.h fails to compile with clang14 for 32bit ARM

ion are copies CLANG originals modified for (my) readability. I'm not an attorney, but if used, it may be necessary to include the banner from the CLANG arm_neon.h. NOTE2: While I can build the CLANG ARM implementation, I lack the hardware to test it. Regards, Roger On 12/3/24 7:37 PM, R

Re: lib/eal/arm/include/rte_vect.h fails to compile with clang14 for 32bit ARM

tions? Regards, Roger On 12/2/24 8:26 PM, Ruifeng Wang wrote: +Arm folks. From: Roger Melton (rmelton) <mailto:rmel...@cisco.com> Date: Tuesday, December 3, 2024 at 3:39 AM To: dev@dpdk.org<mailto:dev@dpdk.org> <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>, Ruifeng Wang <mailto:ruifeng.w...@arm.com>

lib/eal/arm/include/rte_vect.h fails to compile with clang14 for 32bit ARM

Hey folks, We are building DPDK with clang14 for a 32bit armv8-a based CPU and ran into a compile error with the following from lib/eal/arm/include/rte_vect.h: #if (defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM) && defined(RTE_ARCH_32)) || \ (defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM64) && RTE_CC_IS_GNU

Re: [PATCH] net/vmxnet3: Fix vmxnet3 NULL pointer deref after configuration failure

On 10/30/24 4:28 PM, Roger Melton (rmelton) wrote: > On 10/29/24 11:15 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: >> On 10/26/2024 3:33 PM, Roger B Melton wrote: >>> Problem: >>> >>> If vxmnet3_dev_configure() fails, applications may call >>> vmxnet3_dev_close(). If

Re: [PATCH] net/vmxnet3: Fix vmxnet3 NULL pointer deref after configuration failure

On 10/29/24 11:15 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 10/26/2024 3:33 PM, Roger B Melton wrote: >> Problem: >> >> If vxmnet3_dev_configure() fails, applications may call >> vmxnet3_dev_close(). If the failure occurs before the vmxnet3 >> hw->shared structure is allocated the close will lead to a segv. >>

Re: Commit broke 32-bit testpmd app

: Monday, January 30, 2023 at 3:29 PM To: Maxime Coquelin <mailto:maxime.coque...@redhat.com>, chenbo@intel.com<mailto:chenbo@intel.com> <mailto:chenbo@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org<mailto:dev@dpdk.org> <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> Cc: Roger Melton (rmelton)

Re: Commit broke 32-bit testpmd app

) <mailto:spee...@cisco.com> Date: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 1:08 PM To: Maxime Coquelin <mailto:maxime.coque...@redhat.com>, chenbo@intel.com<mailto:chenbo@intel.com> <mailto:chenbo@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org<mailto:dev@dpdk.org> <mailto:dev@dp

Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK ENA PMD spurious ierrors

Hi Igor, Thanks for the help. I’ll be happy to test patches when you are ready. Regards, Roger From: "Chauskin, Igor" Date: Friday, December 18, 2020 at 4:29 PM To: "Roger Melton (rmelton)" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "m...@semihalf.com" , "m...@semihalf

Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK ENA PMD spurious ierrors

ot;Roger Melton (rmelton)" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "m...@semihalf.com" , "m...@semihalf.com" , "Tzalik, Guy" Subject: RE: DPDK ENA PMD spurious ierrors Hi Roger, Thanks for reporting this. Your suggestion seems like a valid workaround, we’ll work on prep

[dpdk-dev] DPDK ENA PMD spurious ierrors

We are seeing issues with the DPDK 18.11 ENA PMD incrementing rx_errors stat on good packets (checksum later validated by software). We’ve tried several versions from DPDK 18.11 stable, including 18.11.9 and 18.11.10. Looking through ENA PMD commits, I see there have been a number of rx stats