?
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Mcnamara, John [mailto:john.mcnamara at intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 02, 2016 11:24 AM
> To: Mussar, Gary; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Tools: Fix issue with virtio interface names
>
>
>
&
> -Original Message-
> From: Ferruh Yigit [mailto:ferruh.yigit at intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 02, 2016 10:55 AM
> To: Wiles, Keith; Mussar, Gary
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] rte_kni.ko with lo_mode=lo_mode_ring
>
> On 9/2/2016 3:1
The pktgen docs state that the rte_kni.ko should be loaded with
lo_mode=lo_mode_ring however the source in dpdk master does not appear to
understand this value. This wasn't an issue in the past since the kni code
would simply disable lo_mode if you passed in an unknown value.
The Ubuntu 4.4.0-3
I will get a proper patch sent hopefully today.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Mcnamara, John [mailto:john.mcnam...@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 7:00 AM
To: Mussar, Gary; Dey, Souvik; Stephen Hemminger
Cc: nhorman at tuxdriver.com; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev
-Original Message-
From: Dey, Souvik [mailto:so...@sonusnet.com]
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 7:17 PM
To: Mussar, Gary; Stephen Hemminger
Cc: nhorman at tuxdriver.com; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] dpdk-devbind.py: Virtio interface issue.
Hi,
I already followed the
We did this slightly differently. This is 100% python and is a bit more
general. We search for the first "net" directory under the specific device
directory.
---
--- tools/dpdk-devbind.py 2016-08-29 11:02:35.594202888 -0400
+++ ../dpdk/tools/dpdk-dev
> -Original Message-
> From: Harish Patil [mailto:harish.patil at qlogic.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 02, 2015 01:51
> To: Mussar, Gary; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Status of bnx2x pmd?
>
> >
> >I have been attempting to build testpmd wit
I have been attempting to build testpmd with the bnx2x pmd enabled to try and
talk through a bcm57810 10G NIC card. I have tried using SR-IOV VFs and I have
tried using the PFs. Neither seem to be able to be properly initialized in
testpmd and/or testpmd aborts.
Is this PMD actually usable or i
This may be a long shot, but I have noticed that using dissimilar device types
when launching the VM that these devices might not be bound to the same eth
devices in the VM. Are you sure that esn3 is the device you are expecting to
use to talk to the host?
Gary
-Original Message-
From:
9 matches
Mail list logo