On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 10:53 AM Maxime Coquelin
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/14/18 10:51 AM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 12/14/18 10:32 AM, Matthias Gatto wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 7:11 PM Maxime Coquelin
> >> wrote:
> >>>
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 7:11 PM Maxime Coquelin
wrote:
>
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On 12/6/18 5:00 PM, Matthias Gatto wrote:
> > fdset_add can call fdset_shrink_nolock which call fdset_move
> > concurrently to poll that is call in fdset_event_dispatch.
> >
> > This pa
fdset_add can call fdset_shrink_nolock which call fdset_move
concurrently to poll that is call in fdset_event_dispatch.
This patch add a mutex to protect poll from been call at the same time
fdset_add call fdset_shrink_nolock.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Gatto
---
lib/librte_vhost/fd_man.c | 4
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 2:59 AM, Yuanhan Liu
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 03:25:30PM +0100, Matthias Gatto wrote:
> > fdset_add increment pfdset->num, but fdset_del doesn't decrement
> > pfdset->num,
> > so if we call fdset_add then fdset_del in a loop
n it exceed MAX_FDS.
Because fdset_shrink and fdset_add locks pfdset->fd_mutex we can't call
fdset_shrink inside fdset_add because that would cause a dead lock,
so this patch split fdset_shrink in two, fdset_shrink amd fdset_shrink_nolock.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Gatto
---
lib/librte_
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 4:25 AM, Yuanhan Liu
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 05:05:21PM +0200, Matthias Gatto wrote:
>> As new_device and destroy_device use an int instead of a "struct virtio_net
>> *",
>> The comment about setting VIRTIO_DEV_RUNNING doesn't
ss that this comment
is obsolet and I've remove it.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Gatto
---
lib/librte_vhost/rte_virtio_net.h | 4
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/rte_virtio_net.h
b/lib/librte_vhost/rte_virtio_net.h
index 9caa622..a88aecd 100644
--- a/lib/libr
7 matches
Mail list logo
