Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 3/7] vfio/pci: Introduce VF token

> From: Alex Williamson > Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2020 7:06 AM > To: k...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: [RFC PATCH 3/7] vfio/pci: Introduce VF token > > If we enable SR-IOV on a vfio-pci owned PF, the resulting VFs are not > fully isolated from the PF. The PF can always cause a denial of > ser

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/7] vfio/pci: SR-IOV support

> From: Alex Williamson > Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2020 7:18 AM > To: k...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] vfio/pci: SR-IOV support > > > Promised example QEMU test case... > > commit 3557c63bcb286c71f3f7242cad632edd9e297d26 > Author: Alex Williamson > Date: Tue Feb 4 13:4

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/7] vfio/pci: SR-IOV support

Hi Alex, Silly questions on the background: > From: Alex Williamson > Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2020 7:06 AM > Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/7] vfio/pci: SR-IOV support > > There seems to be an ongoing desire to use userspace, vfio-based > drivers for both SR-IOV PF and VF devices. Is this series