On 18/12/2018 00:39, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 12/18/2018 12:31 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>> On 12/17/2018 9:14 AM, Tiago Lam wrote:
>>> As of commit 364e08f2bbc0, DPDK allows an aplication to send and receive
>>> raw packets using an AF_PACKET and PACKET_MMAP, when using a Linux
>>> Kernel. This comp
Hi Ferruh,
On 28/11/2018 13:33, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 11/28/2018 1:12 PM, Lam, Tiago wrote:
>> On 27/11/2018 17:43, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>>> On 11/20/2018 10:26 AM, Tiago Lam wrote:
>>>> Use the underlying MTU to calculate the framsize to be used for the mmap
>&
On 27/11/2018 17:43, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 11/20/2018 10:26 AM, Tiago Lam wrote:
>> Use the underlying MTU to calculate the framsize to be used for the mmap
>> RINGs. This is to make it more flexible on deployments with different
>> MTU requirements, instead of using a pre-defined value of 2048B
On 20/11/2018 10:29, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> On 11/20/2018 10:26 AM, Tiago Lam wrote:
>> When setting the MTU, eth_dev_mtu_set() is called to validate the
>> provided MTU. As part of that, it calculates the useful area to store
>> data and compares it against the MTU, to guarantee that there's en
On 16/11/2018 17:20, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 11/15/2018 7:02 PM, Lam, Tiago wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> OvS-DPDK has recently had small a change that changed the data room
>> available in an mbuf (commit dfaf00e in OvS). This seems to have had the
>> consequence
Hi guys,
OvS-DPDK has recently had small a change that changed the data room
available in an mbuf (commit dfaf00e in OvS). This seems to have had the
consequence of breaking the initialisation of eth_af_packets interfaces,
when using default values ("options:dpdk-
devargs=eth_af_packet0,iface=enp6
6 matches
Mail list logo
