[dpdk-dev] Ethtool support in DPDK pmd

Thanks for your reply. Sure KNI can offer ethtool interface. But suppose I am already running a DPDK application on a physical port, but at the same time I want to control the port with ethtool like interface. How could I do that? -hs On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Jayakumar, Muthurajan

[dpdk-dev] Ethtool support in DPDK pmd

Hi, Just thought it would be useful to add ethtool support for poll mode driver, so we could control/check various hardware features on demand. Do you guys have any plan for this? Thanks, -hs

[dpdk-dev] Vmxnet3-pmd not receiving ANY packets

Hi, I'm having a problem with vmxnet-pmd. When I bind vmxnet3 vNIC to vmxnet3-pmd, I cannot receive ANY packets from vmxnet-pmd. I'm running dpdk-1.6.0r2 inside ESXi 5.5 VM. The VM has kernel 3.11.0-12-generic. One thing I notice is that ESXi host does not pass "pdpe1gb" CPU flag to guest VMs

[dpdk-dev] 82599ES NIC support

Thanks for the information. Indeed, it was failing during NIC initialization stage. The problem was due to frequency scaling. After I disable it from bios, I am now able to run dpdk. Thanks again! -hs On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Shaw, Jeffrey B wrote: > If you read the output that

[dpdk-dev] 82599ES NIC support

u said, and run testpmd app. It ends with an error "Cause: No probed ethernet devices - check that CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IGB_PMD=y and that CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_EM_PMD=y and that CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_PMD=y in your configuration file" Here is the detailed debug output: http://pastebin.com/tW

[dpdk-dev] 82599ES NIC support

ipsets are supported by DPDK while it says so in http://dpdk.org/doc/nics What is the discrepancy between 82599ES and 82599EB, which causes the former to fail to work with DPDK? Is it possible to fix this problem? I'll be glad to help fix it. Thanks, -HS