ess is required. The reason is simple, if
> >>process A thinks the virtual address of an mbuf is 123, and process
> >>B thinks the virtual address of the same mbuf is 456, either
> >>process may segmentation fault, accessing mbuf memory that is not
> >>actua
Hi,
I'd like to split DPDK application functionality into a setup (primary)
process and business logic (secondary) processes.
The secondary processes access the hardware queues directly (exclusive queue
per process) and not through software rings.
I'm running into an initialization problem:
Hi Prashant,
Based on our experience, using DPDK cross CPU sockets may indeed result in
some performance degradation (~10% for our application vs. staying
in socket. YMMV based on HW, application structure, etc.).
Regarding CPU utilization on core 1, the one picking up traffic: perhaps I
had mis
Hi Surya,
SSE3 instructions are not enabled by default.
To enable, you can either tell gcc your CPU architecture (-march=) as
suggested
by Marc, or enable just the specific SSE version that's supported by your
CPU (e.g.,
make TOOLCHAIN_CFLAGS="-msse4")
See http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/i386-
Hi Pepe,
I?m assuming you?re creating and accessing the ring safely (i.e.,
single/multiple consumers and producers).
Based on the code, these return values are possible if the ring somehow got a
NULL object pointer enqueued to it.
>From the ring?s perspective the entries are valid, and
Hi Pepe,
In addition, you may want to consider the frame's lifetime, to ensure memory
is used and released
in a valid way.
When sending, it may be de-referenced by DPDK and consequently a memory free
may be tried.
Hence, it is important that the raw buffer used for the ARP packet is
allocated wit
6 matches
Mail list logo
