Thanks, Konstantin.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 1:45 AM, Ananyev, Konstantin <
konstantin.ananyev at intel.com> wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Dax Rawal
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 7
Hi Sergio,
>TODOs:
> - Implement memzone_unreserve, simply call rte_malloc_free.
> - Implement mempool_delete, simply call rte_memzone_unreserve.
> - Init heaps with all available memsegs at once.
> - Review symbols in version map.
I do not see rte_memzone_unreserve in API documentation. Is this
Hi Cyril,
Definitely, yes.
Thanks.
-Dax
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Cyril Chemparathy
wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jun 2015 11:30:17 -0700
> Hi Dax,
>
> Dax Rawal wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I use mempool APIs to allocate DMA-able descriptor ring and buffers
> > so tha
Hi,
I use mempool APIs to allocate DMA-able descriptor ring and buffers so that
I get both physical and virtual addresses of allocated memory. I buffers I
get from the mempool APIs are 64 byte aligned. My requirement is 256byte
alignment. How to achieve this? mempool APIs do not seem to take alignm
Hi,
How does one return (or destroy) ret_mempool that was created by
rte_mempool_create() ?
Thanks.
Hi,
I am a new to DPDK and am interested in using just the rte_mempool and not
the rest of it. I have these question if this is possible.
-What else has to be build (apart from rte_mempool) as a mandatory minimum
?
-What is the init function for rte_mempool ?
-Any guideline as to how to integrate
6 matches
Mail list logo