Hi Parshant,
I ran DPDK on a system with AMD processor without any problem or any
modification.
Daniel
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Prashant Upadhyaya
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has anybody attempted to run DPDK on AMD processors.
> Does it run straightforward or would there be some obvious issues
. 512)
will significantly improve the CPU scalability.
Regards,
Daniel Kaminsky
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Jayakumar, Muthurajan <
muthurajan.jayakumar at intel.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> Please find the attached paper http://kfall.net/ucbpage/papers/snc.pdf
> Figures 4 an
Hi David,
Please notice that the default configuration doesn't enable 1588 support.
Daniel
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Jayakumar, Muthurajan <
muthurajan.jayakumar at intel.com> wrote:
> Please find the code for 1588 support
> http://www.dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/tree/app/test-pmd/ieee1588fwd.
Sabu,
I think that in this case the packet length is zero which will result in
nothing from mtod.
Daniel
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 3:03 PM, sabu kurian wrote:
> Hello chris,
>
> Thanks for your reply. I tried dumping the contents of mbuf as you have
> suggested.
> This is what I get:
>
> dump m
Hi,
Are you sure that this is the line that gives the error? How did you define
m_pool?
Regarding coping one byte, copy using simple assignment should be the most
efficient way. If you want to make sure it is just 8 bits, do a bit wise
and (& 0xff).
Daniel
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:27 AM, sab
We're using CentOS 6.5 and Ubuntu 12.04 and don't see any issue with both
of them.
Regards,
Daniel Kaminsky
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Prashant Upadhyaya <
prashant.upadhyaya at aricent.com> wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Intel DPDK release notes(1.5.2) mentio
Hi Sharath,
Try rte_eth_stats_get, I think this should give you what you're looking for.
Regards,
Daniel
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 7:29 AM, Sharath wrote:
> hi !
>
> can someone please tell me whether the DPDK provides any method to handle
> below
>
> a. account the packet drops at NIC level ? i
Hi James,
Did you try a non-tagged traffic? I suspect this is the limitation of the
l2fwd or the requirements of Spirent. From my experience with Ixia, the L2
forward device must implement the ARP protocol (at least a subset of it).
Also, notice that the l2fwd example sets the destination MAC add
Hi Shlomi,
Currently DPDK supports most of Intel 1Gb and 10Gb NICs. The exact list can
be found at lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci_dev_ids.h
The reason is the the DPDK includes a poll mode driver and for a different
NIC you might need a different poll mode driver.
Regards,
Daniel Kaminsky
Hi C R,
This is a limitation of the KNI example and not of the DPDK package. The
current KNI example can use one core for single task - Egress/Ingress on
one port.
You definitely can change it, look into *main_loop *function.
Regards,
Daniel Kaminsky
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 11:32 AM, cr singh
rds,
> Helin
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Kaminsky
> Sent: Friday, December 20, 2013 12:36 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] Loop back mode of the KNI
>
> Hi all,
>
> We're worki
Did you run the program using "sudo"?
Daniel Kaminsky
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 24, 2013, at 3:05 AM, Surya Nimmagadda wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I try to run the sample applications like l2fwd or exception_path, they
> get aborted at rte_malloc_socket.
>
> Can so
Hi all,
We're working on the KNI and we see a strange behavior which seems like a
bug in the the kernel module.
When running with *lo_mode=lo_mode_fifo *everything works as expected, the
packets looks similar on the ingress and egress.
But when running with *lo_mode=lo_mode_fifo_skb *the packets
chen_Ip,
You shoudln't use PKT_RX_IPV4_HDR, either just PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM or some
other combination of PKT_TX_* (e.g. PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK)
Daniel
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 8:23 AM, chen_lp wrote:
> Hi,
> I want NIC to calculate ip checksum on dpdk-1.5.0,
>
> I have set:
> static const struct rte_
Hi Jyotiswarup,
Did you initialized all the relevant parts before
(rte_eal_init(), rte_pmd_init_all() and don't forget rte_eal_pci_probe())?
Regards,
Daniel
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Jose Gavine Cueto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How are you using it? I've successfully used it with vbox.
>
> Cheers
izeof(struct ipv4_hdr);
> fields?
>
> Regards,
> Vladimir
>
>
> 2013/11/7 Daniel Kaminsky
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Did anyone had an experience using the PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM flag?
> > I have an application that generates IP traffic but whenever I try to set
> > th
Hi,
Did anyone had an experience using the PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM flag?
I have an application that generates IP traffic but whenever I try to set
this flag on (*m->ol_flags = PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM)* the rte_mbuf nothing is sent
out.
Retrieving that statistics from the ethernet device show zero for opackets
and
Hi Prashant,
>From your description it seems that you can use rte
*pktmbuf_refcnt_update*method. Increase the reference count by one
before sending the mbuf, and
decrease it when you finish with it.
Regards,
Daniel Kaminsky
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Prashant Upadhy
18 matches
Mail list logo
