[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Fixed environment variable name

2018-11-16 Thread Burdick, Cliff
The documentation specifies the DEST_DIR parameter to ninja to override the install directory, but it's actually DESTDIR. Signed-off-by: Cliff Burdick --- doc/build-sdk-meson.txt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/build-sdk-meson.txt b/doc/build-sdk-meson.t

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-11-15 Thread Burdick, Cliff
-Original Message- From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 9:17 AM To: Luca Boccassi Cc: Burdick, Cliff; Thomas Monjalon; Burakov, Anatoly; dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if prima

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-11-15 Thread Burdick, Cliff
-Original Message- From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 8:41 AM To: Burdick, Cliff Cc: Luca Boccassi; Thomas Monjalon; Burakov, Anatoly; dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if prima

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-11-15 Thread Burdick, Cliff
-Original Message- From: Luca Boccassi [mailto:bl...@debian.org] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 1:33 AM To: Burdick, Cliff; Bruce Richardson Cc: Thomas Monjalon; Burakov, Anatoly; dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing t

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-11-14 Thread Burdick, Cliff
-Original Message- From: Luca Boccassi [mailto:bl...@debian.org] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 10:15 AM To: Burdick, Cliff; Bruce Richardson Cc: Thomas Monjalon; Burakov, Anatoly; dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is mi

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-11-14 Thread Burdick, Cliff
-Original Message- From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 3:48 AM To: Burdick, Cliff Cc: Thomas Monjalon; Burakov, Anatoly; dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing t

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-11-13 Thread Burdick, Cliff
From: Thomas Monjalon [tho...@monjalon.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2018 2:18 PM To: Burdick, Cliff Cc: Burakov, Anatoly; dev@dpdk.org; bruce.richard...@intel.com Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is mi

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-11-13 Thread Burdick, Cliff
-Original Message- From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2018 8:44 AM To: Burdick, Cliff Cc: Burakov, Anatoly; dev@dpdk.org; bruce.richard...@intel.com Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing t

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-11-13 Thread Burdick, Cliff
-Original Message- From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2018 8:07 AM To: Burdick, Cliff Cc: Burakov, Anatoly; dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs 13/11/2018 16:45, Bu

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-11-13 Thread Burdick, Cliff
-Original Message- From: Burakov, Anatoly [mailto:anatoly.bura...@intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2018 1:39 AM To: Thomas Monjalon; Burdick, Cliff Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs On 13-Nov-18 9:

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-11-12 Thread Burdick, Cliff
This patch was submitted by Jean Tourrilhes over two years ago, but didn't receive any responses. I hit the same issue recently when trying to use cgo (Golang) as a primary process linked to libdpdk.a against a C++ application linked against the same library. The history of the patch is here: h

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Added jumboframe RX offload flag in example using 9KB packets

2018-11-06 Thread Burdick, Cliff
I apologize if any formatting is wrong here, since this is my first post. I noticed with i40e jumboframes cannot be received without the offload flag set, even though the max_rx_pkt_len is set to 9000. This is the case in the ip_pipeline example, so I don't think packets that large would work un