ardson [mailto:bruce.richardson at intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 9:48 AM
> To: Sanford, Robert
> Cc: Matt Laswell; Wiles, Keith; dev at dpdk.org; Assaad, Sami (Sami)
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Port Mirroring
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 01:46:21PM +, Sanford, Robert wrote:
>
Big Thanks!
Sami.
From: Matt Laswell [mailto:lasw...@infiniteio.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 4:28 PM
To: Wiles, Keith
Cc: Assaad, Sami (Sami); dev at dpdk.org; Richardson, Bruce
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Port Mirroring
Keith speaks truth. If I were going to do what you're descr
Thank you!
Best Regards,
Sami.
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 6:10 AM
To: Assaad, Sami (Sami)
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: dev Digest, Vol 45, Issue 9
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 11:18:04PM +, Assaad, Sami
Hello,
I want to build a DPDK app that is able to port-mirror all ingress traffic from
two 10G interfaces.
1. Is it possible in port-mirroring traffic consisting of 450byte packets
at 20G without losing more than 5% of traffic?
2. Would you have any performance results due to packe
Richardson
To: "Assaad, Sami (Sami)"
Cc: "dev at dpdk.org"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK and ASLR
Message-ID: <20150615102138.GB3872 at bricha3-MOBL3>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:53:58PM +, Assaad, Sami (Sami) wrote:
> Wh
son [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 5:19 AM
To: Assaad, Sami (Sami)
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 10G Interface used as PCI Pass-Through reports 64bytes
/ packet
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 04:56:18PM +, Assaad, Sami (Sami) wrote:
> Hello,
>
Hello,
Is it normal that a 10G NIC interface, supporting the 82599 Ethernet
Controller, configured as PCI Pass-through for a virtual machine using DPDK,
reports 64 bytes per packet; no matter what the packet size?
If so; I'm assuming this is to improve the performance of passing the network
t
Hello.
I am using DPDK-Pktgen (Pktgen version 2.77 using DPDK-1.7.1).
My NIC consists of two 10G ports.
Now, my question is : How are the port MBits/s Rx/Tx calculated?
Example: I am running the traffic generator with the following configuration:
* 400 Byte Packet Sizes
* At Li
When I operate a DPDK based application, the EAL always reports the following:
EAL: WARNING: Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) is enabled in the
kernel.
EAL: This may cause issues with mapping memory into secondary processes.
Our application is DPDK client/server based and runs prope
Can this issue be attributed to my BIOS? My Bios is the
following: ProLiant System BIOS P89 V1.21 11/03/2014.
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Sami.
-Original Message-
From: Qiu, Michael [mailto:michael@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 6:01 AM
To: Assaad, Sami
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 12:54:19PM +, Assaad, Sami (Sami) wrote:
> Thanks Bruce for your reply.
>
> Yes, your idea of bringing the PF into the VM looks like an option. However,
> how do you configure the physical interfaces within the VM supporting SRIOV?
> I always belie
From: Ananyev, Konstantin [mailto:konstantin.anan...@intel.com]
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 5:31 AM
To: Richardson, Bruce; Stephen Hemminger
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Assaad, Sami (Sami)
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] How do you setup a VM in Promiscuous Mode using PCI
Pass-Through (SR-IOV)?
> -
...@intel.com]
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 5:27 AM
To: Stephen Hemminger
Cc: Assaad, Sami (Sami); dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] How do you setup a VM in Promiscuous Mode using PCI
Pass-Through (SR-IOV)?
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 04:47:19PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 14 May 2
Hello,
My Hardware consists of the following:
- DL380 Gen 9 Server supporting two Haswell Processors (Xeon CPU E5-2680 v3 @
2.50GHz)
- An x540 Ethernet Controller Card supporting 2x10G ports.
Software:
- CentOS 7 (3.10.0-229.1.2.el7.x86_64)
- DPDK 1.8
I want all the network traffic rece
14 matches
Mail list logo
