RE: DPDK 19.11.3 with multi processes and external physical memory: unable to receive traffic in the secondary processes

Hi Anatoly, Thank you very much for the helpful information and support! Regards, Asaf -Original Message- From: Burakov, Anatoly Sent: Monday, July 25, 2022 12:22 To: Asaf Sinai ; dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: DPDK 19.11.3 with multi processes and external physical memory: unable to

RE: DPDK 19.11.3 with multi processes and external physical memory: unable to receive traffic in the secondary processes

opulating IOVA addresses? 2b. Why “munlock” is not used afterwards? Thanks, Asaf -Original Message- From: Burakov, Anatoly Sent: Friday, July 15, 2022 13:18 To: Asaf Sinai ; dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: DPDK 19.11.3 with multi processes and external physical memory: unable to receive

RE: DPDK 19.11.3 with multi processes and external physical memory: unable to receive traffic in the secondary processes

/ ? From: Asaf Sinai Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2022 13:25 To: Burakov, Anatoly ; dev@dpdk.org Subject: RE: DPDK 19.11.3 with multi processes and external physical memory: unable to receive traffic in the secondary processes Hi Anatoly, Thanks for the comments! So now running with the correct

RE: DPDK 19.11.3 with multi processes and external physical memory: unable to receive traffic in the secondary processes

ries, rte_eal_init() successfully finished, but then calling rte_mempool_lookup() gets null data... ☹ Do you have any idea? Thanks, Asaf -Original Message- From: Burakov, Anatoly Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2022 16:14 To: Asaf Sinai ; dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: DPDK 19.11.3 with m

DPDK 19.11.3 with multi processes and external physical memory: unable to receive traffic in the secondary processes

ate memory on the primary process only. What are we missing? Can you please advise? Thanks, Asaf [Radware] Asaf Sinai ND SW Engineer Email: asa...@radware.com<mailto:asa...@radware.com> T:+972-72-3917050 M:+972-50-6518541 F:+972-3-6488662 [Check out the latest and greatest from Radware

Build igb_uio.ko separately from building all DPDK code

Hi, How to build 'igb_uio.ko', without the need to build all DPDK code? Thanks, Asaf [Radware] Asaf Sinai ND SW Engineer Email: asa...@radware.com<mailto:asa...@radware.com> T:+972-72-3917050 M:+972-50-6518541 F:+972-3-6488662 [Check out the latest and greatest from

[dpdk-dev] net/ice: 'ice_aqc_get_link_status_data->link_cfg_err' bits description

ICE_AQ_LINK_ACT_PORT_OPT_INVAL BIT(2) #define ICE_AQ_LINK_FEAT_ID_OR_CONFIG_ID_INVAL BIT(3) #define ICE_AQ_LINK_TOPO_CRITICAL_SDP_ERR BIT(4) #define ICE_AQ_LINK_MODULE_POWER_UNSUPPORTED BIT(5) #define ICE_AQ_LINK_EXTERNAL_PHY_LOAD_FAILURE BIT(6) Thanks, Asaf [Radware] Asaf Sinai ND SW Engineer

[dpdk-dev] API for number of lanes in transceiver

Hi, Could not find API for getting number of lanes in transceiver (e1000/ixgbe/i40e/mlx5 drivers). Is there such API? We currently use hard-coded values, according to the various SFF standards (8074, 8431, 8436, 8636, etc.). Thanks, Asaf [Radware] Asaf Sinai ND SW Engineer Email: asa

[dpdk-dev] app/testpmd: configure mapping of port queues to cores

(1,1,9),(1,2,10),(1,3,11),(1,4,12),(1,5,13),(1,6,14), (2,0,15),(2,1,16),(2,2,17),(2,3,18),(2,4,19),(2,5,20),(2,6,21)' Unfortunately, I did not find such option or similar one in 'testpmd'. Anyone knows if it is possible, and how? Thanks, Asaf [Radware] Asaf Sinai ND SW Engi

Re: [dpdk-dev] CONFIG_RTE_EAL_NUMA_AWARE_HUGEPAGES: no difference in memory pool allocations, when enabling/disabling this configuration

Hi Anatoly, Thank you very much for the useful explanations! Thanks, Asaf -Original Message- From: Burakov, Anatoly Sent: Monday, December 10, 2018 12:10 PM To: Asaf Sinai ; Ilya Maximets ; Hemant Agrawal ; dev@dpdk.org; Thomas Monjalon Cc: Ilia Ferdman ; Sasha Hodos Subject: Re

Re: [dpdk-dev] CONFIG_RTE_EAL_NUMA_AWARE_HUGEPAGES: no difference in memory pool allocations, when enabling/disabling this configuration

To: Burakov, Anatoly ; Hemant Agrawal ; Asaf Sinai ; dev@dpdk.org; Thomas Monjalon Cc: Ilia Ferdman ; Sasha Hodos Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] CONFIG_RTE_EAL_NUMA_AWARE_HUGEPAGES: no difference in memory pool allocations, when enabling/disabling this configuration On 27.11.2018 13:33, Burakov, Anato

Re: [dpdk-dev] CONFIG_RTE_EAL_NUMA_AWARE_HUGEPAGES: no difference in memory pool allocations, when enabling/disabling this configuration

+CC Ilia & Sasha. -Original Message- From: Burakov, Anatoly Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 04:57 PM To: Ilya Maximets ; Asaf Sinai ; dev@dpdk.org; Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] CONFIG_RTE_EAL_NUMA_AWARE_HUGEPAGES: no difference in memory pool allocations, when enab

Re: [dpdk-dev] CONFIG_RTE_EAL_NUMA_AWARE_HUGEPAGES: no difference in memory pool allocations, when enabling/disabling this configuration

be this is why it works fine? Thanks, Asaf -Original Message- From: Burakov, Anatoly Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 01:10 PM To: Asaf Sinai ; dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] CONFIG_RTE_EAL_NUMA_AWARE_HUGEPAGES: no difference in memory pool allocations, when enabling/disa

[dpdk-dev] CONFIG_RTE_EAL_NUMA_AWARE_HUGEPAGES: no difference in memory pool allocations, when enabling/disabling this configuration

47be40-0x2f825fff40, len=1589504, hugepage_sz=2MB) Does anyone know what is "CONFIG_RTE_EAL_NUMA_AWARE_HUGEPAGES" configuration used for? Thanks, Asaf [Radware] Asaf Sinai ND SW Engineer Email: asa...@radware.com<mailto:asa...@radware.com> T:+972-72-3917050 M:+972-50-6518541 F

Re: [dpdk-dev] Compilation of MLX5 driver

Hi Shahaf, Thanks for the useful information! -Original Message- From: Shahaf Shuler [mailto:shah...@mellanox.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2018 02:16 PM To: Asaf Sinai Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Nitin Katiyar ; Nélio Laranjeiro Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] Compilation of MLX5 driver Tuesday, July

Re: [dpdk-dev] Compilation of MLX5 driver

Additional questions: Is it possible to use MLNX_OFED-4.3 on Ubuntu 12.04? Why is the driver related to OS version? -Original Message- From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Asaf Sinai Sent: Monday, July 2, 2018 05:22 PM To: Shahaf Shuler Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Nitin Katiyar

Re: [dpdk-dev] Compilation of MLX5 driver

] Sent: Monday, July 2, 2018 05:11 PM To: Asaf Sinai Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Nitin Katiyar ; Nélio Laranjeiro Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] Compilation of MLX5 driver Hi Asaf, Monday, July 2, 2018 3:46 PM, Asaf Sinai: > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] Compilation of MLX5 driver > > Additional details: &g

Re: [dpdk-dev] Compilation of MLX5 driver

and installed the EN driver (mlnx-en-4.0-2.0.0.1-ubuntu12.04-x86_64), but it also failed with the same error. Both drivers were compiled with "--dpdk" argument ("--upstream-libs" is not supported). -Original Message- From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behal

Re: [dpdk-dev] Compilation of MLX5 driver

Hi Shahaf, I face similar problem with DPDK 18.05, where missing file is "mlx5dv.h": == Build drivers/net/mlx5 CC mlx5.o In file included from /net/emcradware/CM_Users/asafsi/work/drivers/dpdk/dpdk-18.05/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.h:35:0, from /net/