Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal/ppc: fix redefine bool type

2020-05-02 Thread Raslan Darawsheh
Hi, > -Original Message- > From: David Christensen > Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2020 10:41 PM > To: Ori Kam ; Thomas Monjalon > ; Matan Azrad ; Shahaf > Shuler ; Slava Ovsiienko > ; Beilei Xing ; Qi Zhang > ; Maxime Coquelin > ; Zhihong Wang > ; Xiaolong Ye > Cc: Raslan Darawsheh ; > davi

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eventdev: fix device probe and remove for secondary process

2020-05-02 Thread Varghese, Vipin
Hi Pavan, Snipped > >> > > > >> > > When probing event device in secondary process skip > >> > > reinitializing the device data structure as it is already done in > >> > > primary > process. > >> > > > >> > > When removing event device in secondary process skip closing the > >> > > event device

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 5/6] doc: update sample app with unknown speed

2020-05-02 Thread Ivan Dyukov
01.05.2020 16:28, Andrew Rybchenko пишет: > On 4/27/20 12:57 PM, Ivan Dyukov wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Ivan Dyukov >> --- >>   doc/guides/sample_app_ug/link_status_intr.rst | 3 ++- >>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/doc/guides/sample_app_ug/link_status_intr.rst

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] examples/ipsec-secgw: add per core packet stats

2020-05-02 Thread Anoob Joseph
Hi Konstantin, Thanks for the review. Please see inline. @Akhil, do you have any comments? Thanks, Anoob > -Original Message- > From: Ananyev, Konstantin > Sent: Friday, April 24, 2020 4:44 PM > To: Anoob Joseph ; Akhil Goyal ; > Nicolau, Radu > Cc: Narayana Prasad Raju Athreya ; dev@

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] common/octeontx: fix GCC 9.1 ABI break

2020-05-02 Thread pbhagavatula
From: Pavan Nikhilesh GCC 9.1 fixes a bug with passing bitfields as pass by value in function parameters and generates a warning for the same as below: drivers/common/octeontx/octeontx_mbox.c:282:1: note: parameter passing for argument of type ‘struct mbox_intf_ver’ changed in GCC 9.1 Fix the w

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] app/testpmd: support flow aging

2020-05-02 Thread Bill Zhou
Currently, there is no way to check the aging event or to get the current aged flows in testpmd, this patch include those implements, it's included: - Registering aging event when the testpmd application start, add one new command to set verbose bitmaps for all events. If RTE_ETH_EVENT_FLOW_AGED

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eventdev: fix device probe and remove for secondary process

2020-05-02 Thread Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
Hi Vipin, >Hi Pavan, > >snipped >> > > >> > > When probing event device in secondary process skip reinitializing >> > > the device data structure as it is already done in primary process. >> > > >> > > When removing event device in secondary process skip closing the >> > > event device as it shoul

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eventdev: fix device probe and remove for secondary process

2020-05-02 Thread Varghese, Vipin
Hi Pavan, snipped > > > > > > When probing event device in secondary process skip reinitializing > > > the device data structure as it is already done in primary process. > > > > > > When removing event device in secondary process skip closing the > > > event device as it should be done by primary

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/1] bus/pci: optimise scanning with whitelist/blacklist

2020-05-02 Thread Gaëtan Rivet
On 02/05/20 13:12 +0530, Sunil Kumar Kori wrote: > rte_bus_scan API scans all the available PCI devices irrespective of white > or black listing parameters then further devices are probed based on white > or black listing parameters. So unnecessary CPU cycles are wasted during > rte_pci_scan. > >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eventdev: fix device probe and remove for secondary process

2020-05-02 Thread Jerin Jacob
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 6:56 PM Jerin Jacob wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 11:40 PM wrote: > > > > From: Pavan Nikhilesh > > > > When probing event device in secondary process skip reinitializing > > the device data structure as it is already done in primary process. > > > > When removing eve

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] event/octeontx2: fix queue removal from Rx adapter

2020-05-02 Thread Jerin Jacob
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 4:44 PM Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula wrote: > > >When eth port queue is removed from Rx adapter using > >rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queue_del() it incorrectly > >initializes CQ context instead of modifying it. This > >might lead to a crash when CQ context is modified > >as a pa

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/1] bus/pci: optimise scanning with whitelist/blacklist

2020-05-02 Thread Sunil Kumar Kori
rte_bus_scan API scans all the available PCI devices irrespective of white or black listing parameters then further devices are probed based on white or black listing parameters. So unnecessary CPU cycles are wasted during rte_pci_scan. For Octeontx2 platform with core frequency 2.4 Ghz, rte_bus_s

Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] bus/pci: optimise scanning with whitelist/blacklist

2020-05-02 Thread Sunil Kumar Kori
>-Original Message- >From: Gaëtan Rivet >Sent: Saturday, May 2, 2020 2:30 AM >To: Sunil Kumar Kori >Cc: step...@networkplumber.org; david.march...@redhat.com; Jerin Jacob >Kollanukkaran ; dev@dpdk.org >Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] bus/pci: optimise scanning with >whitelist/blacklist