On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 8:10 PM, Dai, Wei wrote:
> Hi, Tonghao
> Thanks for your patch.
> It looks that same change can be applied to ixgbe_dev_interrupt_action( )
> and ixgbe_dev_interrupt_delayed_handler( ).
Yes, but the irq (e.g mailbox irq) is not same as rx interrupt
handled frequently.
and
> -Original Message-
> From: Xing, Beilei
> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 4:42 PM
> To: Zhang, Qi Z
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix packet type parser issue
>
> Ptype mapping table will fail to update when loading PPP profile, fix the
> issue
>
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 4:39 PM, Dai, Wei wrote:
> Hi, Tonghao & Beilei
>
> The issue reported by Tonghao is caused by shortage of igb_uio.
> If you want to use Rx queue interrupt in your DPDK application,
> I suggest use VFIO-PCI to bind NIC port instead of igb_uio.
The performance of igb_uio is
Hi Alex & Keith
Base on my further understanding about OVS requirement and the new
device's capability.
I realize there is no strong point to have the timeout APIs from this
patch, I'd like to withdraw it.
Thanks for all your comments that help me to think it over
13/01/2018 13:15, Burakov, Anatoly:
> On 11-Jan-18 11:45 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 07/11/2017 10:50, Jonas Pfefferle1:
> >>> Is there something urgent for 17.11?
> >>> Or can it be refined in 18.02?
> >>
> >> Nothing urgent. We can refine this for 18.02.
> >>
> >>> Anatoly, any thought?
> >
>
Please see my comments inline.
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 1:24 AM, Thomas Monjalon
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I moved your top-post below and did some comments inline.
> More opinions are welcome.
>
> 13/01/2018 23:05, Aleksey Baulin:
> > On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 6:35 PM, Thomas Monjalon
> > wrote:
> > > 21/
Hi,
I moved your top-post below and did some comments inline.
More opinions are welcome.
13/01/2018 23:05, Aleksey Baulin:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 6:35 PM, Thomas Monjalon
> wrote:
> > 21/11/2017 08:05, Aleksey Baulin:
> > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Wiles, Keith
> > wrote:
> > > > > O
This is an interesting question. Perhaps, even a philosophical one. :-)
'likely(pointer)' is a perfectly legal statement in C language, as well as
a concise one as
compared to a more explicit (and redundant/superfluous) 'likely(pointer !=
NULL)'. If you
_require_ this kind of explicitness in cases
> On Jan 13, 2018, at 12:51 PM, Shailja Pandey wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Output of command ‘lspci | grep Ether’ is-
>
> 04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet Controller 10-Gigabit
> X540-AT2 (rev 01)
> 04:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet Controller 10-Gigabit
Hi,
There is a new compilation error since this commit in LPM:
http://dpdk.org/commit/b2e1c99
The brace has been removed because unnecessary with anonymous union.
This union is declared with RTE_STD_C11 for compatibility
with old compilers:
/** C extension macro for environments l
Hi,
Output of command ‘lspci | grep Ether’ is-
04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet Controller 10-Gigabit
X540-AT2 (rev 01)
04:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet Controller 10-Gigabit
X540-AT2 (rev 01)
05:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Qi Zhang
> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2017 4:23 AM
> To: Lu, Wenzhuo
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Dai, Wei; Wang, Liang-min; Zhang, Qi Z; sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] net/e1000: fix mailbox interrupt
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Qi Zhang
> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2017 4:22 AM
> To: Lu, Wenzhuo
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Dai, Wei; Wang, Liang-min; Zhang, Qi Z; sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] net/ixgbe: fix mailbox interrupt
13/01/2018 01:28, Neil Horman:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 03:55:10PM +, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > After this point agree to using EXPERIMENTAL tag in the version map as
> > standard,
> > but it will be hard to maintain "API is experimental for first release"
> > without
> > help of any automated
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Wenzhuo Lu
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 3:12 PM
> To: markus.th...@tu-ilmenau.de; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] net/e1000: add pci ids for 82579LM
>
> > Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 18:32:18 +0200
> >
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Zhao1, Wei
> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 2:59 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Zhang, Helin; Zhao1, Wei
> Subject: [PATCH v4] net/i40e: fix port segmentation fault when restart
>
> This patch will go into the process of clear all queue region related
> configur
On 19-Dec-17 11:14 AM, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
This patchset introduces a prototype implementation of dynamic memory allocation
for DPDK. It is intended to start a conversation and build consensus on the best
way to implement this functionality. The patchset works well enough to pass all
unit test
On 11-Jan-18 4:07 AM, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
- }
- /* fall-through on error */
- default:
- RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, " cannot get container fd!\n");
- close(socket_fd);
- return -
> On Dec 18, 2017, at 9:34 AM, Konstantin Ananyev
> wrote:
>
> Simple functional test for rte_smp_mb() implementations.
> Also when executed on a single lcore could be used as rough
> estimation how many cycles particular implementation of rte_smp_mb()
> might take.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konstan
> On Dec 18, 2017, at 9:34 AM, Konstantin Ananyev
> wrote:
>
> Simple functional test for rte_smp_mb() implementations.
> Also when executed on a single lcore could be used as rough
> estimation how many cycles particular implementation of rte_smp_mb()
> might take.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konstan
On 11-Jan-18 4:07 AM, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
---
lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_proc.c | 144 +---
lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_eal.h | 73 +++-
lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map | 2 +
3 files changed, 206 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
On 11-Jan-18 4:07 AM, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
By the multi-process channel, we add an mp action named "proc".
As a secondary process starts, it sends a "proc add" message to
the primary.
As the primary finds a failure in sending message to a specific
secondary process, that secondary process is tre
On 11-Jan-18 4:07 AM, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_proc.c
b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_proc.c
index 40fa982..d700e9e 100644
+
int
rte_eal_primary_proc_alive(const char *config_file_path)
{
@@ -31,3 +75,347 @@ rte_eal_primary_proc_alive(const
On 11-Jan-18 11:45 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
07/11/2017 10:50, Jonas Pfefferle1:
Is there something urgent for 17.11?
Or can it be refined in 18.02?
Nothing urgent. We can refine this for 18.02.
Anatoly, any thought?
Anatoly, Jonas, how do you want to proceed with this patch?
I don't s
On 31-Oct-17 3:59 PM, Jonas Pfefferle wrote:
Check and report errors on open/read in noiommu check.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Pfefferle
---
LGTM
Acked-by: Anatoly Burakov
--
Thanks,
Anatoly
25 matches
Mail list logo
