On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:39:24PM -0400, Zhihong Wang wrote:
> This patch implements the vhost logic from scratch into a single function
> designed for high performance and better maintainability.
As always, your commit log just states what have been done, but doesn't
tell why such changes have b
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:22:13AM -0500, Keith Wiles wrote:
> The rte_eth_tap.c PMD creates a device using TUN/TAP interfaces
> on the local host. The PMD allows for DPDK and the host to
> communicate using a raw device interface on the host and in
> the DPDK application. The device created is a T
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 07:43:36AM +, Yang, Zhiyong wrote:
> Hi, yuanhan:
> Thanks so much for your detailed comments.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 2:20 PM
> > To: Yang, Zhiyong
> > Cc:
On 18 September 2016 at 15:22, Jan Viktorin wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 13:58:50 +0800
> Jianbo Liu wrote:
>
>> On 9 September 2016 at 16:43, Shreyansh Jain
>> wrote:
>> > Introduction:
>> > =
>> >
>> > This patch set is direct derivative of Jan's original series [1],[2].
>> >
>> >
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:35:53AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-09-14 15:21, Yuanhan Liu:
> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 09:10:48AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 2016-09-14 12:43, Yuanhan Liu:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 05:10:09PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > > 2016-09-13 1
Regards,
Keith
> On Sep 18, 2016, at 8:25 AM, Yuanhan Liu
> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:22:13AM -0500, Keith Wiles wrote:
>> The rte_eth_tap.c PMD creates a device using TUN/TAP interfaces
>> on the local host. The PMD allows for DPDK and the host to
>> communicate using a raw device
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 04:32:46PM +0100, John Griffin wrote:
> Hi Liu,
> Comments embedded.
>
> Rgds,
> John.
>
> On 05/09/16 04:23, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:21:38AM +0100, John Griffin wrote:
> >>Remove the dependency on dev->driver->pci_drv.name when
> >>creating the me
Hi,
It seems there is a memory leak in eth_pcap_rx_jumbo() in
case rte_pktmbuf_alloc() fails on any segment that is not the initial
segment.
If someone can confirm it, I'll patch it.
TIA,
Dror
On 9 September 2016 at 16:43, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
> Introduction:
> =
>
> This patch set is direct derivative of Jan's original series [1],[2].
>
> - As this deviates substantially from original series, if need be I can
>post it as a separate patch rather than v2. Please suggest
On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 09:41:55 +
Hemant Agrawal wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jan Viktorin [mailto:viktorin at rehivetech.com]
>
[...]
> > > And for each platform/product
> > >
> > > > I agree, that this can sometimes lead to code duplication. Moreover,
> > > > it o
On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 16:56:54 +0800
Jianbo Liu wrote:
> On 18 September 2016 at 15:22, Jan Viktorin
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 13:58:50 +0800
> > Jianbo Liu wrote:
> >
> >> On 9 September 2016 at 16:43, Shreyansh Jain
> >> wrote:
> >> > Introduction:
> >> > =
> >> >
> >>
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 06:38:06PM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> >>>+static inline void __attribute__((always_inline))
> >>>+flush_used_ring(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> >>>+ uint32_t used_idx_start)
> >>>+{
> >>>+ if (used_idx_start + vq->shadow_used_idx < vq->
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Viktorin [mailto:viktorin at rehivetech.com]
> On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 16:56:54 +0800
> Jianbo Liu wrote:
>
> > On 18 September 2016 at 15:22, Jan Viktorin
> wrote:
> > > On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 13:58:50 +0800
> > > Jianbo Liu wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 9 Septemb
On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 13:58:50 +0800
Jianbo Liu wrote:
> On 9 September 2016 at 16:43, Shreyansh Jain
> wrote:
> > Introduction:
> > =
> >
> > This patch set is direct derivative of Jan's original series [1],[2].
> >
> > - As this deviates substantially from original series, if need
Dear Tetsuya Makawa,
I was watching your video on DPDK Hotplug module
There is a mention about PMD for NFV connected port.
At that time of the video (2015) it mentions no support.
Now is the support available? From which version we have support please?
Thank you very much
M Jay
Tested-by: Yong Liu
- Tested Branch: dpdk-next-crypto/master
- Tested Commit: 3e329d659b62097d15ec86ff92acc8effaf28cd2
- OS: Fedora20 3.11.10-301.fc20.x86_64
- GCC: gcc version 4.8.3 20140911
- CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz
- NIC: Intel Corporation Device Fortville [8086:1583]
-
Tested-by: Yong Liu
- Tested Branch: dpdk-next-crypto/master
- Tested Commit: 3e329d659b62097d15ec86ff92acc8effaf28cd2
- OS: Fedora20 3.11.10-301.fc20.x86_64
- GCC: gcc version 4.8.3 20140911
- CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz
- NIC: Intel Corporation Device Fortville [8086:1583]
-
Tested-by: Yong Liu
- Tested Branch: dpdk-next-crypto/master
- Tested Commit: 3e329d659b62097d15ec86ff92acc8effaf28cd2
- OS: Fedora20 3.11.10-301.fc20.x86_64
- GCC: gcc version 4.8.3 20140911
- CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz
- NIC: Intel Corporation Device Fortville [8086:1583]
-
> -Original Message-
> From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2016 10:56 AM
> To: Maxime Coquelin
> Cc: Wang, Zhihong ; dev at dpdk.org;
> thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] vhost: batch update used ring
>
> On Thu
19 matches
Mail list logo
