> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Sonnads,
> ShantkumarX
> Sent: Monday, August 8, 2016 7:53 AM
> To: 'dev at dpdk.org'
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] qos_meter: Incorrect value check in
> example file.
>
> Sorry, Missed the attachment, res
When a rule with depth > 24 is added into an existing
rule with depth <=24, a new tbl8 is allocated, the existing
rule first fulfill whole new tbl8, so the filed valid of
each entry in this tbl8 is always true and depth of each
entry is always <= 24 before adding the new rule with depth > 24.
Sign
As a bug-fix for lpm tlb8 recycle is introduced,
add a test case to verify tlb8 group is correctly
freed when it only includes a rule with depth=24.
Signed-off-by: Wei Dai
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson
---
app/test/test_lpm.c | 80 -
1 file chang
When all rules with depth > 24 are deleted in a same sub-table
(tlb8 group) and only a rule with depth <=24 is left in it,
this sub-table (tlb8 group) should be recycled.
Fixes: dc81ebbacaeb ("lpm: extend IPv4 next hop field")
Fixes: af75078fece3 ("first public release")
Signed-off-by: Wei Dai
A
Hi,
On 8/6/2016 12:19 PM, ??? wrote:
> From 3edca1e3194959ba26a6c36143f8423009661b11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: zhouyangchao
> Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 19:14:51 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] kni: error release device list head could cause a kernel
> crash.
>
> Signed-off-by: zhouyangchao
> ---
>
On 8/6/2016 7:16 AM, Rami Rosen wrote:
> This patch fixes a typo in doc/guides/nics/intel_vf.rst.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rami Rosen
Acked-by: Ferruh Yigit
? 2016/8/7 4:33, Jan Viktorin ??:
> On Fri, 05 Aug 2016 09:51:06 +0200
> Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
>> 2016-08-05 09:44, Thomas Monjalon:
>>> 2016-08-05 10:09, linhaifeng:
hi,thomas
Could you change the name of file in directory
app/test/test_pci_sysfs/bus/pci/devices/ ?
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone on this list has come across this problem of
rte_eth_rx_burst returning the same mbuf contents multiple times especially
during congestion. I notice this problem after some number of calls to
rte_eth_rx_burst when I set the nb_pkts argument to anything more than 5. I
Hi all,
Congratulations on a successful DPDK 16.07 release! It is wonderful to see the
community continue to grow and develop with each release.
Following the success of DPDK Userspace Summit last October in Dublin we are
delighted to invite you back to Userspace Summit October 2016! The two da
On 8/8/2016 7:36 AM, David Marchand wrote:
> Hello Ferruh,
>
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Ferruh Yigit
> wrote:
>> PCI device ids moved from common header into ixgbe driver itself.
>>
>> KNI starts using pci_device_id from kni/ethtool/ixgbe driver, this is
>> only for KNI ethtool support, K
Hi,
1. I?m seeing 128 mbufs leaked on each stop/start cycle when polling is
stopped, you?re right that the leak is more severe when the device is polled
while calling rte_eh_dev_stop.
2. Maybe the limitations per each function should be moved in the rte_eh_dev
documentation from the head
Hello Ferruh,
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> PCI device ids moved from common header into ixgbe driver itself.
>
> KNI starts using pci_device_id from kni/ethtool/ixgbe driver, this is
> only for KNI ethtool support, KNI data path is not effected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ferruh
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Thomas Monjalon
wrote:
> What do you think about this list? I would say we can remove it.
Yes, we already discussed this with John.
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-January/031595.html
--
David Marchand
Sorry, Missed the attachment, resending email with attachment.
From: Sonnads, ShantkumarX
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 4:21 PM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: [PATCH] qos_meter: Incorrect value check in example file.
Attached is patch for dpdk.org
Attached is patch for dpdk.org
Hi Stephen,
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen at networkplumber.org]
> Sent: Saturday, August 6, 2016 12:36 AM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com; Wang, Zhihong;
> lining18 at jd.com
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] n
Hi Stephen,
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen at networkplumber.org]
> Sent: Saturday, August 6, 2016 12:34 AM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com; Wang, Zhihong;
> lining18 at jd.com
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] n
Oddly enough, it seems to work fine under cygwin. That should solve your
issue.
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 11:50 PM, linhaifeng wrote:
> ? 2016/8/7 4:33, Jan Viktorin ??:
> > On Fri, 05 Aug 2016 09:51:06 +0200
> > Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >
> >> 2016-08-05 09:44, Thomas Monjalon:
> >>> 2016-08-05 1
18 matches
Mail list logo
