> On Apr 26, 2015, at 4:56 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 04:08:23PM +, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 4/25/15, 8:30 AM, "Marc Sune" wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 24/04/15 19:51, Matthew Hall wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 12:39:47PM -0500, Jay Rolette wrote:
>
Hi,
I'm working on a DPDK-based packet generator [1] and I recently tried to
upgrade from DPDK 1.7.1 to 2.0.0.
However, I noticed that DPDK 1.7.1 is about 25% faster than 2.0.0 for my use
case.
So I ran some basic performance tests on the l2fwd example with DPDK 1.7.1,
1.8.0 and 2.0.0.
I used an
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 04:08:23PM +, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>
>
> On 4/25/15, 8:30 AM, "Marc Sune" wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >On 24/04/15 19:51, Matthew Hall wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 12:39:47PM -0500, Jay Rolette wrote:
> >>> I can tell you that if DPDK were GPL-based, my company wouldn't
Simply initialze rx_pkt_burst callback to ixgbe_recv_pkts_lro_bulk_alloc() if
the conditions are right.
This is possible because work against HW in LRO and scattered cases is exactly
the same
and LRO callback already supports the bulk allocation.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Zolotarov
---
lib/librte_pm
Kill ixgbe_recv_scattered_pkts() - use ixgbe_recv_pkts_lro_single_alloc()
instead.
Work against HW queues in LRO and scattered Rx cases is exactly the same.
Therefore we may drop the inferior callback.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Zolotarov
---
lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 2 +-
lib/librte_pm
Signed-off-by: Vlad Zolotarov
---
lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c | 3 ---
lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
index 60344a9..a45f51e 100644
--- a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe
Move the above fields from ixgbe_hw to ixgbe_adapter.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Zolotarov
---
lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe/ixgbe_type.h | 2 --
lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 8 +++
lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h | 3 +++
lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c | 38 ++
This series includes:
- Fix the "issue" introduced in 01fa1d6215fa7cd6b5303ac9296381b75b9226de:
files in librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe/ are shared with FreeBSD and AFAIU should
not
be changed unless the change is pushed into the FreeBSD tree first.
- Remove unused rsc_en field in ixgbe_rx
On 4/26/15, 11:53 AM, "Wiles, Keith" wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>I noticed in my builds with foo.S file I would get a warning from the
>compiler the foo_s.o.tmp linker file will not be used as the code is not
>linked. A strange error and the foo_s.o file would not be created. In the
>mk/internal/rte.com
Hi All,
I noticed in my builds with foo.S file I would get a warning from the
compiler the foo_s.o.tmp linker file will not be used as the code is not
linked. A strange error and the foo_s.o file would not be created. In the
mk/internal/rte.compile-pre.mk we have the following
# command to assemb
Hi Neil,
Thanks for taking the time to reflect on my ideas.
On 24 April 2015 at 19:00, Neil Horman wrote:
> DPDK will always be
> something of a niche market for user to whoom every last ounce of
> performance is
> the primary requirement
This does seem like an excellent position. It is succi
Hi Kang,
Sorry for the late response.
ConnectX-3 VPI card that you have is supported. So there shouldn?t be any
problem.
Please make sure to follow the instructions in
http://www.dpdk.org/doc/guides/nics/mlx4.html
What MLNX_OFED did you install?
What is the output of ibdev2netdev?
Make sure, mlx
12 matches
Mail list logo
